Why is the friction greater on rear wheels than front wheels in a car?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences in friction between rear and front wheels of a car, particularly during acceleration. It is noted that while weight is equally distributed, the frictional forces are not, as the driving wheels must overcome additional resistance to accelerate the vehicle. When moving at a constant speed, friction can be equal if air resistance is neglected, but in real scenarios, friction is necessary for acceleration. The actual friction on non-driving wheels is typically low, as it mainly counters rolling resistance. Overall, friction on the driving wheels is greater due to the need for acceleration and overcoming resistance.
lavankohsa
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
fz28og.png

My book says option a,b,c is correct. I am able to understand the option a and b but why the friction has larger magnitude on rear wheels than the front wheels.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


According to me it should be same because weight of the car is equally distributed on front and rear wheels.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lavankohsa said:
because weight of the car is equally distributed on front and rear wheels.
It is not (see motorbikes for extreme examples), but that is not the point: the car is accelerating, so the forces are not balanced.
 
mfb said:
motorbikes for extreme examples

Ok. and what about if the car is moving with uniform speed then front and rear wheel should have equal friction ?
 
If you neglect air resistance (something you cannot do for real cars), yes.
 
But if car is in pure rolling motion, then the friction is zero i guess .
 
In an even more hypothetical example where there is no friction at all and the car is going at constant speed, friction is zero.
 
lavankohsa post: 5007298 said:
According to me it should be same because weight of the car is equally distributed on front and rear wheels.
Even if the weight were equally distributed, that only says the maximum frictional force is the same on each. In rolling motion, the actual frictional force is anything from 0 to maximum (static) frictional force (in any direction).
The actual frictional force on the non-driving wheels is typically very low, since it only needs to be sufficient to overcome rolling resistance of the tyres and provide their rotational acceleration. The actual frictional force of the driving wheels has to overcome that of the non-driving wheels plus provide for the acceleration of the vehicle.
 
lavankohsa said:
But if car is in pure rolling motion, then the friction is zero i guess .
Only if the car is coasting. If it is accelerating on the flat or maintaining a constant speed on a hill (or moving in any way that an engineless cart would not) then there must be some friction.

Edit: if it is accelerating at all there must be friction to provide the angular acceleration of the wheels, so that includes coasting up or down hill.
 
Last edited:
Thanks all for reply
 
Back
Top