Why is the gauge group for Ashtekar variable theory for General

AI Thread Summary
The gauge group for Ashtekar variable theory in General Relativity is SU(2) due to its three-dimensional structure. SU(2) is isomorphic to SO(3), meaning they are structurally equivalent, which raises questions about the choice of SU(2) over SO(3). The discussion explores the implications of this choice and whether there are significant phenomenological differences between using SU(2) and SO(3). Understanding this distinction is crucial for the theoretical framework of Ashtekar variables. Ultimately, the preference for SU(2) relates to its mathematical properties and relevance in quantum gravity contexts.
yyoon@fas.harvard.edu
As far as I understand, the gauge group for Ashtekar variable theory
for General Relativitiy is SU(2), because its group is three-
dimensional. But, why is this SU(2) instead of SO(3)? Are there any
plausible reasonings behind this? And, are there any phenomenological
differences if the gauge group were SO(3) instead of SU(2)?

Thanks in advance

Youngsub
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Lie group SU(2) is isomorphic to SO(3), that is, they're structurally equivalent.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
6K
Back
Top