Why is the gravitational potential not zero at the neutral point?

AI Thread Summary
The gravitational potential at the neutral point is not zero because the potential function is negative definite, meaning it remains negative for all finite distances. The concept of a "neutral point" can vary, leading to confusion about its implications for gravitational potential. Potential is typically measured from infinity, where it equals zero, indicating that at finite distances, such as the neutral point, the potential will not cancel out to zero. Therefore, the gravitational influences of two bodies do not negate each other at this point. Understanding the reference point for measuring potential is crucial in this context.
nokia8650
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
The image below shows a sketh of gravitation potential (y axis) vs. position:

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/5717/60413547vb3.th.jpg

Can someone please explain why the potential does not equal zero at the neutral point - wouldn't the two potentials cancel each other out?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nokia8650 said:
Can someone please explain why the potential does not equal zero at the neutral point - wouldn't the two potentials cancel each other out?
First off, why would you expect it to go to zero? That plot is of

u(r) = -\left(\frac{GM_e}{|r|} + \frac{GM_m}{|R_m-r|}\right)

That function is negative definite: its value is negative for all finite values of r.


Secondly, what do you mean by "neutral point"? This term has multiple meanings.
 
nokia8650 said:
The image below shows a sketh of gravitation potential (y axis) vs. position:

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/5717/60413547vb3.th.jpg

Can someone please explain why the potential does not equal zero at the neutral point - wouldn't the two potentials cancel each other out?

Thanks

Hi nokia8650! :smile:

Where is the potential being measured from (in other words, where is zero potential)?

Potential is often measured "from infinity" …

in that case, the potential will only be zero at an infinite distance from both the Earth and the Moon. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top