Why is the helicity of a neutrino unchanged by the weak interaction?

Final
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi...

Consider a neutrino with a Dirac mass m_\nu and the weak interaction

{\cal{L}}=\frac{g}{2 \sqrt{2}} \sum_l[{W_{\mu}^+ \cdot \bar{\psi}_{\nu_l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_l + W_{\mu}^- \cdot \bar{\psi}_{l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_{\nu_l} }\right{]} + \frac{g}{4 \cos(\theta_w)} <br /> \sum_l Z_{\mu}[ \bar{\psi}_{\nu_l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_{\nu_l} +\bar{\psi}_{l} \gamma^{\mu}(a+b\gamma_5)\psi_{l} ]
Why this interaction doesn't change the helicity of the neutrino? It is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any elements in that interaction that have a left-handed neutrino on one side of the operator and a right-handed one on the other?
 
For massless particle ok, because the elicity is the chirality projector \frac{1 \pm \gamma^5}{2}... But for a massive neutrino? It's the same?
 
I don't see any 1+\gamma^5 there, do you? Which leads me back to my original point: do you see anything in the Lagrangian which has a left-handed neutrino on one side of the operator and a right-handed one on the other?
 
Yes... For example Z_{\mu} \bar{\psi}_{\nu_l} \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)\psi_{\nu_l}. You may take \nu \rightarrow \nu +Z with the first neutrino left-handed and the second right-handed.
The amplitude is {\cal{M}}_{fi} \approx \bar{u}&#039; \gamma^{\mu}(1-\gamma_5)u \epsilon_{\mu}
with u^t=\sqrt{\epsilon+m}(\omega_+,\frac{\vec{p}\cdot\vec{\sigma}}{\epsilon+m}\omega_+ ) and u&#039;^t=\sqrt{\epsilon&#039;+m}(\omega_-,\frac{\vec{p&#039;}\cdot\vec{\sigma}}{\epsilon+m}\omega_- ) where \omega_{\pm} are the eigenstates of the elicity...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Back
Top