I Why is the Kinetic Energy Operator Differentiated Twice Instead of Squared?

Mayan Fung
Messages
131
Reaction score
14
When I learned about operators, I learned <x> = ∫ Ψ* x Ψ dx, <p> = ∫ Ψ* (ħ/i ∂/∂x) Ψ dx. The book then told me the kinetic energy operator

T = p2/2m = -ħ2/2m (∂2/∂x2)
I am just think that why isn't it -ħ2/2m (∂/∂x)2
Put in other words, why isn't it the square of the derivative, but differentiating it twice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chan Pok Fung said:
When I learned about operators, I learned <x> = ∫ Ψ* x Ψ dx, <p> = ∫ Ψ* (ħ/i ∂/∂x) Ψ dx. The book then told me the kinetic energy operator

T = p2/2m = -ħ2/2m (∂2/∂x2)
I am just think that why isn't it -ħ2/2m (∂/∂x)2
Put in other words, why isn't it the square of the derivative, but differentiating it twice?
They're just different notations for the same thing: the 2nd derivative is the square of the 1st derivative.
Cf. 2nd derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes Mayan Fung
As the name suggests operators operate on the Hilbert space vectors. They are linear operators mapping ##|\psi \rangle \in \mathcal{H}## to another vector ##\hat{A} |\psi \rangle \in \mathcal{H}##. By definition the product of two operators is the composition of these operations, i.e., ##\hat{B} \hat{A}|\psi \rangle## first maps ##|\psi \rangle## to ##\hat{A} |\psi \rangle## and then this vector to ##\hat{B}(\hat{A} |\psi \rangle)=\hat{B} \hat{A} |\psi \rangle##. Thus ##\partial_x^2=\partial_x \partial_x## applied to a position-space wave function means. You first take the derivative of the wave function and then take the derivative of the result again, i.e., you take the 2nd derivative of the wave function. Then the usual notation is
$$\left (\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right)^2=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Mayan Fung
Thanks all!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top