Why is the Lorentz force calculated in Ansys Maxwell so low?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lorentz force calculated in Ansys Maxwell appears significantly lower than expected, with results around 10-4 N instead of the anticipated 0.1 N based on the formula F=B*I*l. The discussion highlights a simple model involving a magnetically conductive plate in a static magnetic field, where a 10 A electric current runs perpendicular to the magnetic field of approximately 10 mT. Users have tested both 3D and 2D models, yielding similar low results, indicating a potential issue in the simulation setup or parameters used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz force calculations
  • Familiarity with Ansys Maxwell software
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields and their properties
  • Experience with modeling in 3D and 2D environments
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Ansys Maxwell documentation on Lorentz force calculations
  • Investigate the impact of mesh settings on simulation accuracy in Ansys
  • Learn about the effects of boundary conditions in electromagnetic simulations
  • Explore troubleshooting techniques for low force outputs in Ansys Maxwell
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, simulation specialists, and researchers working with electromagnetic fields and Ansys Maxwell software who are troubleshooting force calculations in their models.

densaface
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is the Lorentz force calculated in Ansys so low? According to the formula F=B*I*l, it is supposed to be at least 1000 times higher. The model is really simple: a magnetically conductive plate in a static magnetic field inducts the magnetic field from the surrounding space, which makes its own magnetic field dozens of times stronger than in the surrounding vacuum (which is perfectly logical) - around 10 mT. A 10 A electric current runs perpendicular to this magnetic field in the plate. According to the formula, F=B*I*l=10-2*10*1=0.1 N, but the program produces results in the range of 10-4 N for the Lorentz force. I have tried both 3D and 2D models and the result is nearly identical. What am I missing?

p.s. I can attach my project file if it helps
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
just in case the project archive
 

Attachments

Hello, did you find the answer to this? I have the same problem...
Regards
Mario
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
993
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
16K