Why is the phase of an imaginary signal 90 degrees?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of phase shifts in electrical signals, particularly focusing on why the phase of an imaginary signal is considered to be 90 degrees. Participants explore this topic through various theoretical and practical perspectives, including the behavior of inductors and capacitors, the representation of signals using complex numbers, and the implications of these representations in electrical engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that in the expression "Z=R+jX", the imaginary part represents the reactive component of impedance, leading to a phase difference of 90 degrees between voltage and current across reactance.
  • One participant questions why the phase shift is specifically 90 degrees and not another value, suggesting that any angle can be expressed as a sum of orthogonal components.
  • Another participant explains that the behavior of inductance results in a 90-degree phase shift because the voltage is the derivative of the current, which is sinusoidal.
  • A different viewpoint presents a conceptual analogy involving phase shifts in marching, stating that multiplying a sine wave by an imaginary number results in a 90-degree phase shift, as 90 degrees is half of 180 degrees.
  • One participant discusses the advantages of using imaginary numbers in representing sinusoidal variables, linking it to the Cartesian coordinate system and its preference for 90-degree separations between axes.
  • Another contribution emphasizes the physical properties of inductors and capacitors, explaining that their opposition to instantaneous changes in current and voltage leads to phase shifts, with mathematical derivations provided to illustrate these relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the reasons behind the 90-degree phase shift, with some agreeing on the mathematical and physical principles involved, while others challenge or seek further clarification on the underlying reasons. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific justification for the 90-degree phase shift, with multiple competing explanations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference mathematical relationships and physical behaviors of electrical components, but the discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of terms and the applicability of certain models, which are not fully resolved.

Manoj Sahu
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
Like we write "R+jX" where jX is considered to be imaginary term and it said to have 90 degree phase shift.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Manoj Sahu said:
Like we write "R+jX" where jX is considered to be imaginary term and it said to have 90 degree phase shift.
The imaginary part denotes the reactive component of the phasor.
In Z=R+jX, X is the reactive part of the impedance i.e. reactance. The phase difference between voltage across the reactance and current through the reactance is 90 degrees.
 
cnh1995 said:
The imaginary part denotes the reactive component of the phasor.
In Z=R+jX, X is the reactive part of the impedance i.e. reactance. The phase difference between voltage across the reactance and current through the reactance is 90 degrees.
Actually you didn't the question. What I was asking is "why 90 only not more or less?"
 
Manoj Sahu said:
Actually you didn't the question. What I was asking is "why 90 only not more or less?"

See the PF Insights Article https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/case-learning-complex-math/

Any angle ##\theta## can be expressed as the sum of two components B+jC. where B and C are "orthogonal" (look up the meaning of orthogonal). But you can't do that if say C was 44 degrees from B. For example,there would be no sum of B and C able to add up to 50 degrees.

If ##\sqrt{B^2+C^2}=1## then multiplying by B+jC is "pure rotation" with no change in magnitude, only phase.
 
Manoj Sahu said:
Actually you didn't the question. What I was asking is "why 90 only not more or less?"
Consider the behaviour of inductance we characterise as: v(t)=L.di/dt
If i(t) is sinusoidal, then v(t) being the derivative of a sinusoid is cosinusoidal, i.e., a sinusoid but advanced by 90°. There's the 90° you are asking about. When you calculate impedance as v(t) ÷ i(t) the 90° carries through.

Try a similar approach for capacitance and see what it leads to.
 
Easier way to think of it.
Just as in precision marching - two well executed "Column Left March" commands will exactly reverse your direction.

If you multiply a sinewave signal by [ -1] you have reversed its phase, that is shifted it by 180 degrees.

So - how would you phase shift it by only 90 degrees ? Easy >> multiply it by [√-1] which we know is an imaginary number .

So the reason it's 90 degrees not 89 or 181 is 90 is half of 180.
We assign to "operator j" the value [√-1] .

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, K Murty, Babadag and 3 others
In my opinion the use of imaginary sqrt(-1)=j it is a conventional mode to treat an electric sinusoidal variable as voltage and current. It presents a lot of advantages with respect the simply algebraic calculations.
If an a.c. variable voltage it is v1=sqrt(2).V1.cos(ꞷ.t+ φ) [that means it exists a vo of the same frequency but start at φ=0 vo=sqrt(2).Vo.cos(ꞷ.t)] then we could attach to it an imaginary value sqrt(2).V1.sin(ꞷ.t+ φ).j and we can represent it on Descartes coordinates plan [which rotates with ꞷ radians/sec] as V1ےφ.
Why Descartes preferred 90o between coordinates you’ll find here[I hope]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_coordinate_system
 
Hi,

as others have stated, at least for an inductors and capacitors, with my understanding it is that these elements oppose instant changes in currents and voltages, hence they result in voltage and currents taking more time to change, as compared to resistances, whose I V response is instantaneous. This property due to the physics of such elements, results in the phase shifts.

V_{L} = L \cdot \frac{di}{dt}

If I(t) = I_{m} \sin ( \omega t)
Then \frac{di}{dt} = I_{m} \omega \cos(\omega t)
V_{L} = L \omega I_{m} \cos(\omega t)

It is a definition, or can be proven at least that:
V_{L} = L \omega I_{m} \cos(\omega t) = \Re( L \omega I_{m} \cdot e^{j (\omega t)} )
Comparing with current, we have to express the sine as a cosine:

i(t) = \Re( I_{m} \cdot e^{j (\omega t - \frac{\pi}{2} )} )

We can see a difference in the angle between the curves.
j = e^{j (\frac{\pi}{2}) } \\ -j = e^{j -(\frac{\pi}{2}) } \\ -1 = e^{j(\pi)}
In polar form, when multiplied into another exponential, means a rotation (anticlockwise) of 90 degrees. -J means a clockwise rotation of 90, and -1 you can see. Thus when you take the derivative, say of:
\frac{d}{dt} e^{j (\omega t )} = {j \omega} e^{j (\omega t )} = {\omega} e^{j (\omega t + \frac{\pi}{2}) }

Hence when in phasor domain, we have:
\underline{V} = j \omega L \underline{I}
This captures the inductive reactance, and the phase shifts in the phasor domain, as a phasor is an exponential that keeps the peak value and phase of a signal, with the time domain exponential factored out. Of course, this is only possible for sinusoidal currents and voltages, as you probably know. I have read the term imaginary signal once or twice I think, but the most important aspect is that complex numbers are used to represents the amplitude and phase of a signal, which can be clearly seen in the mathematics with little to moderate pains...below, is an addition of sin(x) + cos(x)

<br /> \Re \left( e^{jx} \right) = \cos(x) \\ \Re \left( e^{j(x - \frac{\pi}{2} )} \right) = \sin(x) \\<br /> <br /> Hence:<br /> <br /> \Re \left( e^{jx} + e^{j(x - \frac{\pi}{2} )} \right)

\Re \left( e^{jx} \cdot ( e^{j0} + e^{j -\frac{\pi}{2} } \right)

Above we factored out the angular frequency, its always kind of hidden that way, the term inside the brackets are your phasors, and phasor addition has to be done by converting to polar form, which is easy and obvious given they are exponentials.\Re \left( e^{jx} \cdot ( e^{j0} + e^{j -\frac{\pi}{2} }) \right) \\e^{j0} +e^{j -\frac{\pi}{2}} =\underline{ 1 - 1j }_{\text{ rectangular or cartesian form}} = \sqrt{2} \cdot e^{j - \frac{\pi}{4}}

\Re \left(e^{jx} \cdot \sqrt{2} \cdot e^{j - \frac{\pi}{4}} \right) = \Re \left( \sqrt{2} \cdot e^{j(x - \frac{\pi}{4} )}\right) \\\Re \left( \sqrt{2} \cdot e^{j(x - \frac{\pi}{4} )}\right) = \sqrt{2} \cos(x - \frac{\pi}{4})

\sqrt{2} \cos ( x - \frac{\pi}{4}) = \sqrt{2} \sin( x + \frac{\pi}{4} )

Now, of course we have used the cosine definition for phasors, but other texts also use the sine one. In one book I have by an Indian author, he avoids the use of imaginary numbers in the introduction to phasors, by referring to the imaginary part as the y component and summing up the components of the vector in the x and y directions, which was also quite nice to see, but later he adopts the normal approach.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
17K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K