Why is the product of Dirac spinors a 4x4 matrix?

tommy01
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi togehter.

I encountered the following problem:

The timeordering for fermionic fields (here Dirac field) is defined to be (Peskin; Maggiore, ...):

<br /> T \Psi(x)\bar{\Psi}(y)= \Psi(x)\bar{\Psi}(y) \ldots x^0&gt;y^0<br />
<br /> = -\bar{\Psi}(y)\Psi(x) \ldots y^0&gt;x^0<br />

where \Psi(x) is a Dirac spinor and \bar{\Psi}(y) = \Psi(y)^\dagger \gamma^0 it's Dirac adjoint so that

<br /> S(x-y) = \langle 0|T{ \Psi(x)\bar{\Psi}(y)}|0 \rangle<br />

is the Feynman propagator which is a 4x4 matrix.
But there is my problem: while it is clear that \Psi(x)\bar{\Psi}(y)} is a 4x4 matrix, \bar{\Psi}(y)\Psi(x) is a scalar.

I would be glad for an explanation.
Thanks.
Tommy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The indices are not contracted, and the propagator is a 4x4 matrix:

<br /> T \Psi_\alpha(x)\bar{\Psi}_\beta(y)= \Psi_\alpha(x)\bar{\Psi}_\beta(y) \hbox{\ if\ } x^0&gt;y^0<br /> \hbox{\ and\ } -\bar{\Psi}_\beta(y)\Psi_\alpha(x) \hbox{\ if\ } y^0&gt;x^0<br />

<br /> S_{\alpha\beta}(x-y) = \langle 0|T{ \Psi_\alpha(x)\bar{\Psi}_\beta(y)}|0 \rangle<br />
 
In other words, the equations must be read component-wise, or you can think of a tensor product of the 2 spinors. That's the only way you can make sense of a product in which the barred spinor appears to the right of an un-barred one.
 
Thanks a lot ...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top