Why is the release date for Windows Longhorn delayed until the end of 2004?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Windows
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the delayed release of Windows Longhorn until the end of 2004, with participants exploring the implications of this delay and discussing various Windows operating systems, including Windows 2003 and Windows XP. The conversation touches on user preferences, security concerns, and the general state of Windows operating systems during that time.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that the delay of Longhorn is simply a matter of time needed for development, suggesting that software creation is a complex process.
  • There is a discussion about whether Windows 2003 is necessary for home users, with some arguing that it is not suitable for standalone home PCs.
  • Participants share personal preferences for different Windows versions, with some favoring Windows XP for home use over Windows 2003 or older versions like Windows 9x or ME.
  • Concerns about security and the use of firewalls are raised, with some suggesting that a hardware firewall (like a router) may suffice for users with always-on connections, while others recommend software firewalls like Norton.
  • One participant humorously questions if the delay of Longhorn is meant to create suspense, indicating a light-hearted take on the situation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessity of Windows 2003 for home users, and there are differing opinions on the effectiveness of firewalls and the implications of the Longhorn delay. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best operating system choice for different user needs.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal experiences and opinions rather than established facts, and there is a lack of clarity on the specific reasons behind the Longhorn delay. The discussion also includes varying assumptions about user needs and security practices.

Saint
Messages
437
Reaction score
0
My home PC is a stand alone machine, do i need windows 2003 ?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
What is that version called, I thought winXP was 2002?
 
You don't need anything in particular. It's entirely a matter of choice. Any Windows system is relatively easy to use. If I didn't give a damn about learning the ins-and-outs of computers, and only wanted a machine for word processing, multimedia stuff, and using the web, I'd use some Windows OS. However, for security, reliability, and other reasons, I would go for another system. Although I'm finding XP Pro is okay so far, as long as you get the security updates and all. But one of the problems with updating Windows online is that you need a proper registered copy to get stuff from Microsoft, and if you do that, it starts by giving them a description of your computer, which kinda sucks.
 
Windows 2003 only comes in server versions...so no, you would not use windows 2003 on your home system.

Windows XP is what I myself prefer, having used 2003 on my company machine for a few days. If you are running Windows 9x or ME, you are crazy...see a doctor

Win2k is a good choice too...but XP is better for home users, imo.
 
Buy Norton firewall if you want to upgrade the software on your PC. It will tell you whenever someone is making a hack attempt on your computer, lots of MS security humor could come from that, especially as the attempts start to decrease over the first few weeks you have the firewall installed.
 
I wouldn't worry about a firewall software unless you are using an always-on connection (cable, dsl, etc). Otherwise, with your IP being dynamic (it usually is when you dial into your ISP), it's unlikely that you will be harrassed.

If you feel the need to use a firewall but don't want to spend the money for a program, windows XP has a basic firewall ability built in. It's not super advanced, but it gets the job done.

As a side note, make sure you disable your messenger service in Win NT, 2k, XP if you aren't using it. Otherwise, you could end up with some annoying ads and such popping up. Quite the pain.
 
Originally posted by Considering
I wouldn't worry about a firewall software unless you are using an always-on connection (cable, dsl, etc).
And if you use a router with your dsl or cable, you also don't need a software firewall. The router is a good hardware firewall.
 
Originally posted by grady
Buy Norton firewall if you want to upgrade the software on your PC. It will tell you whenever someone is making a hack attempt on your computer, lots of MS security humor could come from that, especially as the attempts start to decrease over the first few weeks you have the firewall installed.

sucicide, hackers are known to penetrate norton personal firewall
 
Why Longhorn has to be so late till end of 2004 ?
 
  • #10
Do I need Windows 2003 ?
Of course you do, silly.

Why Longhorn has to be so late till end of 2004 ?
Just to keep you in suspence?
Actually, these things do take time to put together you know. There is no point in holding one's breath as it will arrive when it arrives, and in the mean time we still have windows for workgroups!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
938
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K