Why is the silver anode preferentially discharged in electroplating?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the electroplating of silver, specifically why silver ions (Ag+) from the anode are preferentially discharged over hydroxide ions (OH-) in a silver nitrate solution. The participant notes the electrode potentials, indicating that under alkaline conditions, OH- should discharge preferentially. However, the actual process favors Ag+ discharge. It is clarified that the solution cannot be alkaline due to the potential precipitation of silver hydroxide (AgOH), suggesting a neutral or slightly acidic environment instead. The importance of calculating formal potentials using the Nernst equation is emphasized for a clearer understanding of the reactions occurring. Ultimately, the participant concludes that they have found the answer to their question.
rogen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am quite confusing about the concept of electroplating of silver.
As what I know, the silver anode gives out Ag+ while the Ag+ in the silver nitrate solution deposits on the cathode (e.g. a spoon).

However, why the Ag(s) on the silver anode is preferentially discharged instead of the OH- in silver nitrate solution?

Here are the electrode potentials:
O2(g) + 2 H2O + 4 e <--> 4 OH(aq) +0.4V
Ag+ +  e <--> Ag(s) +0.8V
O2(g) + 4 H+ + 4 e <--> 2 H2O +1.23V

As the process is carried out in alkaline condition, I suppose only the first two equations are involved. From the potential values, the OH- should be preferentially discharged rather than the Ag(s), but the actual situation is the opposite. I am not sure if I have misunderstood anything (e.g. the third equation is involved instead).
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You are comparing standard potentials, you should compare formal potentials, taking into account exact pH of the solution. Solution can't be alkaline - that would mean precipitation of AgOH, so it has to be neutral (if not slightly acidic). Add to that fact that most electrode reactions involving oxygen are sluggish and require substantial overpotentials to proceed quickly.
 
Thanks for your reply:smile:
So should I use the third equation instead of the first one for comparison?
 
You should start calculating formal potentials for all reactions (using Nernst equation). After that it can be already obvious what is going on. (Or not - I have not checked. But that's the most obvious line of attack).
 
Thankssssss Borek :cool:
I got the answer!
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top