Why is the solution for time of flight multiplied by a factor of 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VKnopp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies why the time of flight for a stone thrown vertically upwards is multiplied by a factor of 2. The time calculated (1.5306 seconds) represents only the ascent to maximum height, and the descent takes an equal amount of time due to the symmetry of the motion. Thus, the total time in the air is double the ascent time. An important assumption in these problems is that the stone starts from an initial height of zero. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
VKnopp
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
I have decided to self-teach myself A-Level Physics. I am confused about one particular step of a solution to a certain problem that the textbook provided.

Problem:

A stone is thrown vertically upwards at ##15 ms^{-1}##. How long is the stone in the air until hitting the ground?

There are a few assumptions:

-air resistance is minimal
-displacement and velocity are positive upwards and negative downwards
-acceleration is always downward and therefore negative
-acceleration due to gravity is constant

Solution:

Time of flight is ##2t##, twice time to maximum height. Maximum height is when final velocity ##v=0##.

They use the classic equation.

##v=u+at##

##v=0##, ##u=15 ms^{-1}## and gravity is ##9.8 ms^{-2}##.

##0=15+(-9.8)t##

Solving for ##t## yields ##t=1.5306##. I understand all the way up to here.

They then multiply their solution for ##t## by a factor of ##2## to get the solution. I do not understand why they do this. Why do they do this step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time ## t = 1.5306 ## s is how long it takes the stone to reach its maximum height. The idea behind multiplying by 2 is that the whole process is symmetrical - it takes the same amount of time for the stone to fall back to the ground as it did for the stone to make the trip upward. You could divide the problem in two. The first problem would be to calculate the time for the trip up (and you have that solution already); the second problem would be to have the initial velocity be 0 and calculate the time for the velocity to reach -15 m/s. You will get ## t = 1.5306 ## s again.
 
  • Like
Likes VKnopp
Just as an aside, there is another VERY important assumption, and one that is normally made in such introductory problems, that you have not stated, but which actually should always be stated even though it often isn't. Can you think what it is?
 
Geofleur said:
The time ## t = 1.5306 ## s is how long it takes the stone to reach its maximum height. The idea behind multiplying by 2 is that the whole process is symmetrical - it takes the same amount of time for the stone to fall back to the ground as it did for the stone to make the trip upward. You could divide the problem in two. The first problem would be to calculate the time for the trip up (and you have that solution already); the second problem would be to have the initial velocity be 0 and calculate the time for the velocity to reach -15 m/s. You will get ## t = 1.5306 ## s again.

Of course. I get it know, thank you very much.
 
phinds said:
Just as an aside, there is another VERY important assumption, and one that is normally made in such introductory problems, that you have not stated, but which actually should always be stated even though it often isn't. Can you think what it is?

Is it gravity? I should assume that gravity pulls objects down at a rate of ##9.8 ms^{-2}##.
 
VKnopp said:
Is it gravity? I should assume that gravity pulls objects down at a rate of ##9.8 ms^{-2}##.
But you already have the 9.8 in your stuff, so no that's not it. Think about where the rock starts its travels.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top