- 19,378
- 15,614
Ah, you optimist you.AgentSmith said:We are now into the 21st century. Hopefully we have progressed a bit.
The discussion centers around the question of why the speed of light is what it is, exploring whether it could have been another velocity. Participants delve into the implications of this question within the context of physics, touching on the definitions of units, the nature of physical constants, and the foundational theories of light and relativity.
Participants express differing views on the nature of the question regarding the speed of light. While some agree on the importance of measurement and definitions, others contend that the philosophical implications of "why" remain unresolved. Overall, multiple competing views exist without a consensus.
Participants acknowledge limitations in the discussion, such as the dependence on definitions of units and the unresolved nature of certain theoretical aspects related to the speed of light and fundamental constants.
This discussion may be of interest to those exploring foundational concepts in physics, particularly in relation to the speed of light, electromagnetic theory, and the philosophical implications of physical constants.
Ah, you optimist you.AgentSmith said:We are now into the 21st century. Hopefully we have progressed a bit.