Why is the sum of 1/(n2^n) from 1 to infinity equal to log 2?

Mathematics news on Phys.org
subsonicman said:
I was looking at this topic: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1...country-in-which-people-only-want-boys-closed

And the top answer uses the fact that the sum from 1 to infinity of 1/(x2^x) is log 2. Why is this true?
For starters, it's not true. What you wrote is different from what you linked to. This is what's in that answer.

$$ \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}\frac{n}{n+1} = 1 - log(2)$$
 
I just rewrote the thing in the link to only include the part I was having difficulty with.

$$ \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}\frac{n}{n+1} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}\left(1 - \frac{1}{n+1}\right)=1-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(n+1)2^{n+1}}=1-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n2^{n}}$$. The link says that this is equal to $$1-\textstyle\log 2$$ (or less ambiguously, ln 2) which is why I said what I did in the first post. And I'm pretty sure it is true. I wrote a program and I summed from 1 to 100 and I got almost exactly ln 2.
 
Consider the geometric series:

\sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} x^n = \frac{1}{1-x}

Then integrating yields

\int_0^t \sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} x^n dx = \sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} \int_0^t x^n dx = \sum_{n=0}^{+\infty} \frac{1}{n+1} t^{n+1} = \sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{t^n}{n}

And thus

\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{t^n}{n} = \int_0^t\frac{1}{1-x} dx = -\log|1-t|

Filling in ##t=1/2## gives us

\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{1}{n2^n} = - \log(1/2) = \log(2)

I leave it up to you to justify each step in this calculation rigorously.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top