I Why is there a -1/2 in the Lagrangian density for ω mesons?

izzi wekwek
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
upload_2016-3-12_12-21-2.png


My question is why there is -1/2 for ω meson?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you find these lagrangians?
I would remove the (-)1/2( ...) bit.
Then it can be correct if σ is complex and ω is real valued.
 
No, you shouldn't remove the ##-1/2## ;-), because it's correct. You obviously work in the east-coast metric, where ##(\eta_{\mu \nu})=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)##. The physical degrees of freedom of ##\omega^{\mu}## are three space like vectors, and thus to get the right sign for the kinetic and the mass term there must be that additional - sign.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top