Why Is There a '2' in the Capacitor Force Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The force acting on one plate of a parallel plate capacitor, attracting it toward the other plate, is given by the formula F = Q^2 / (2*8.854e-12*A). The presence of the '2' in the denominator accounts for the division of the electric field strength between the two plates. This division occurs because the electric field lines originate from one plate and terminate on the other, effectively halving the field strength experienced by each plate. Understanding this concept clarifies why the electrostatic force formula includes the factor of 2. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between charge, area, and the resulting force in capacitor dynamics.
AgPIper
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A parallel plate capacitor has charge Q and plates of area A. What force acts on one plate to attract it toward the other plate?

It's F = Q^2 / (2*8.854e-12*A) ... something to do with the electric field divided in 2? Wondering why there's a 2 in the denominator... thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the force that one plate exerts on the other, first find the field created by the charge on that plate. That's where the 2 will come in.
 


The force acting on one plate of a parallel plate capacitor is known as the electrostatic force and it is given by the formula F = Q^2 / (2*8.854e-12*A). This force is responsible for attracting the plates towards each other. The 2 in the denominator represents the distance between the plates, which is divided by 2 in the formula. This is because the electric field between the plates is divided in half due to the fact that the electric field lines originate from one plate and terminate on the other plate. Therefore, the strength of the electric field is also divided by 2, resulting in the 2 in the denominator. I hope this helps to clarify any confusion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top