Why is there a doubt in Coulomb's formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikromancer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Formula
AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's formula describes the force between two charged bodies as F = k(q1*q2/d^2), where k is a constant. The confusion arises from interpreting the sign of the force; like charges repel while unlike charges attract. The formula provides only the magnitude of the force, not its direction. The full vector form clarifies that the force is repulsive for like charges and attractive for unlike charges. Understanding the vector notation is crucial for correctly interpreting the nature of the force in different scenarios.
nikromancer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Coulomb's formula states that the force of attraction between two electrically charged bodies is k(q1*q2/d^2), where k is 9*10^9 Nm^2/C^2. However, I have a doubt regarding this.
We know that like charges repel and unlike charges attract. Let us take the case of like charges first. If both q1 and q2 are like charges, the value of q1*q2 will be positive. As d and k are also positive, the force of attraction will also be positive. However, this means that like charges ATTRACT each other rather than repel. Similarly, if q1 and q2 are unlike charges, then the force of attraction will be negative and this means that unlike charges repel and like charges attract. But this isn't true.
So, shouldn't the formula be F= -k(q1*q2/d^2) or |F|=k(|q1*q2|/d^2)?? Please clarify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula you give only gives the magnitude of the force, not the direction.

The full (vector) form giving the force on charge 1 is
k {q_1q_2 \over r^2}\mathbf{\hat{r}}_{21}
where \mathbf{\hat{r}}_{21} is the vector pointing from charge 2 to charge 1. So if the charges are like, then the force vector will point along this vector, meaning it is repulsive.
 
You shouldn't interpret F as the force of attraction. The F in Coulomb's law is simply THE force charge 1 exerts on charge 2. If it is negative, it will be attractive (in the direction to make the distance between chages decrease) and if it is positive, it will be repulsive.

The notation you are using can confuse whether the force is attractive or not. The unambiguous way of writing coulomb's law is with vector notation (3 dimensions):

The force charge 1 exerts on charge 2 is

\vec F = K \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}\hat r
where \hat r is the unit vector from q1 to q2 (i.e. \vec r_2-\vec r_1).

In one dimension, you can work with signs, but you have to take care with the directions.

F = K(q_1q_2/d^3) * (x2-x1), where (x2-x1) is the signed distance x2-x1. So if x2>x1, then x2-x_1=d and the force is Kq_1q_2/d^2. This is positive for like charges, to the force is such that x_2 tends to increase (repellant). Figure out the other cases yourself.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top