MHB Why is there a Mass Term in the Denominator of the Spacecraft's Motion Equation?

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
How does the solution have a m in the denominator next to c?

A perfectly reflecting solar sail is deployed and controlled so that its normal vector is always aligned with the radius vector from the sun.
The force exerted on the spacecraft due to solar radiation pressure is
$$
\mathbf{F} = \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3}
$$
where $S$ is the solar intensity, $A$ is the sail area and $c$ is the speed of light.

Show that the equation of motion for the spacecraft is
$$
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} + \left(\mu - \frac{2 S A}{cm}\right)\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} = 0.
$$

The equation of motion for a spacecraft in the absence of a solar sail is
$$
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} = -\frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}.
$$
Summing the forces, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} & = & \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} - \frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}\\
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} - \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} + \frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r} & = & 0\\
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} + \left(\mu - \frac{2 S A}{c}\right)\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} & = & 0
\end{alignat*}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Dustinsfl said:
Summing the forces, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} & = & \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} - \frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}\\
\end{alignat*}
It's important to distinguish between force and acceleration. The left side of the equation above is acceleration. But the first term on the right side is a force while the second term on the right is acceleration. So the equation is not dimensionally consistent.

The gravitational force is ## \mathbf{F}_{\rm g} = - \frac{m\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}##.

So, the total force is $$ \mathbf{F}_{\rm net} = \mathbf{F}_{\rm sail} +\mathbf{F}_{ \rm g} = \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} - \frac{m\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r} $$

Now use ##\ddot{\mathbf{r}} =\large \frac{\mathbf{F}_{\rm net}}{m}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and Greg Bernhardt
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top