MHB Why is there a Mass Term in the Denominator of the Spacecraft's Motion Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the motion equation of a spacecraft with a solar sail, highlighting the role of mass in the denominator of the acceleration equation. The force from solar radiation pressure is expressed as F = (2SA/c)(r/r^3), while the gravitational force is Fg = - (mμ/r^3)r. The net force combines these two forces, leading to the equation of motion that incorporates mass, ensuring dimensional consistency. It emphasizes the distinction between force and acceleration, clarifying that the term involving mass in the denominator is essential for accurate representation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing spacecraft motion under solar radiation pressure.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
How does the solution have a m in the denominator next to c?

A perfectly reflecting solar sail is deployed and controlled so that its normal vector is always aligned with the radius vector from the sun.
The force exerted on the spacecraft due to solar radiation pressure is
$$
\mathbf{F} = \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3}
$$
where $S$ is the solar intensity, $A$ is the sail area and $c$ is the speed of light.

Show that the equation of motion for the spacecraft is
$$
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} + \left(\mu - \frac{2 S A}{cm}\right)\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} = 0.
$$

The equation of motion for a spacecraft in the absence of a solar sail is
$$
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} = -\frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}.
$$
Summing the forces, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} & = & \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} - \frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}\\
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} - \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} + \frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r} & = & 0\\
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} + \left(\mu - \frac{2 S A}{c}\right)\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} & = & 0
\end{alignat*}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Dustinsfl said:
Summing the forces, we have
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\ddot{\mathbf{r}} & = & \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} - \frac{\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}\\
\end{alignat*}
It's important to distinguish between force and acceleration. The left side of the equation above is acceleration. But the first term on the right side is a force while the second term on the right is acceleration. So the equation is not dimensionally consistent.

The gravitational force is ## \mathbf{F}_{\rm g} = - \frac{m\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r}##.

So, the total force is $$ \mathbf{F}_{\rm net} = \mathbf{F}_{\rm sail} +\mathbf{F}_{ \rm g} = \frac{2 S A}{c}\frac{\mathbf{r}}{r^3} - \frac{m\mu}{r^3}\mathbf{r} $$

Now use ##\ddot{\mathbf{r}} =\large \frac{\mathbf{F}_{\rm net}}{m}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and Greg Bernhardt
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top