Why is there no maximum temperature?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of maximum temperature, questioning if it exists given that absolute zero is the lowest temperature and the speed of light is the highest speed. Participants reference Planck's temperature, which is theorized to be a limit related to energy and the formation of black holes. It is noted that temperature is tied to kinetic energy, and while the speed of light limits the speed of particles, kinetic energy can increase indefinitely as particles approach this speed. The conversation also touches on the idea of negative temperatures, which can be hotter than infinite temperatures, complicating the notion of a maximum temperature. Overall, the thread explores the theoretical boundaries of temperature within the context of established physical laws.
Sdog
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Given that absolute zero is the lowest temperature possible, were all particles have zero vibration. And given that the speed of light is the highest speed any object, particle, sub atomic or not can travel. Using 2 of the most fundamental laws of physics thermodynamics and general relativity. If all sub atomic or rather if all findamental particles are vibrating at the speed of light in a solid or bumping into each other in a gas at the same speed, is this not surley the absolute maximum temperature?? Please discuss, irrelevant if praticly possible theoretically i believe this is the absolute max
 
  • Like
Likes ScientistAlexandrus
Science news on Phys.org
Sdog said:
Given that absolute zero is the lowest temperature possible, were all particles have zero vibration. And given that the speed of light is the highest speed any object, particle, sub atomic or not can travel. Using 2 of the most fundamental laws of physics thermodynamics and general relativity. If all sub atomic or rather if all findamental particles are vibrating at the speed of light in a solid or bumping into each other in a gas at the same speed, is this not surley the absolute maximum temperature?? Please discuss, irrelevant if praticly possible theoretically i believe this is the absolute max
(Thread prefix changed from "A" = Advanced / PhD level to "I" = Intermediate / Undergraduate level)

Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Have you learned about the Lorentz Factor yet? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor
 
Sdog said:
Given that absolute zero is the lowest temperature possible, were all particles have zero vibration. And given that the speed of light is the highest speed any object, particle, sub atomic or not can travel. Using 2 of the most fundamental laws of physics thermodynamics and general relativity. If all sub atomic or rather if all findamental particles are vibrating at the speed of light in a solid or bumping into each other in a gas at the same speed, is this not surley the absolute maximum temperature?? Please discuss, irrelevant if praticly possible theoretically i believe this is the absolute max
There is. Look up Planck's temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes ScientistAlexandrus
Sdog said:
Given that absolute zero is the lowest temperature possible, were all particles have zero vibration. And given that the speed of light is the highest speed any object, particle, sub atomic or not can travel. Using 2 of the most fundamental laws of physics thermodynamics and general relativity. If all sub atomic or rather if all findamental particles are vibrating at the speed of light in a solid or bumping into each other in a gas at the same speed, is this not surley the absolute maximum temperature??
Temperature is related to kinetic energy. The speed of light does not provide a limit to kinetic energy; kinetic energy increases without limit as you approach it.
 
  • Like
Likes ScientistAlexandrus
It is in all probability linked to Planck's limit which is also based on the Limit to the Speed of Light. Temperature is a resultant of Heat which itself is a form of Energy. What happens is that if you need more Energy at a point or a defined region and start bringing that region with energy and that reaches the Planck's limit,you get a Black Hole where the laws of Physics as we know yet,break down. We can't comprehend the things beyond the Event Horizon so that is not treated with too much relevance to the Temperature. So,by and large,this is the reason why you don't see "Infinite" temperature.
 
And,Absolute Zero is possible? I don't think you can "reach" Absolute zero like that. Even if you go to the lowest possible energy states,there is always some Quantum vibrations and fluctuations as per the Heisenberg principle. In theory and principle,you cannot probably reach that point is what I believe at least according to the conventional Science we have as of now. You can probably go near and near that temperature as it becomes harder to proceed further and at one point becomes impossible. I wish to be corrected on this,though.
 
Flatland said:
There is. Look up Planck's temperature.

Planck units are not the biggest or smallest of anything. The Planck resistance is 30 ohms.

ScientistAlexandrus said:
It is in all probability linked to Planck's limit which is also based on the Limit to the Speed of Light.

See above.
 
  • Like
Likes Herman Trivilino and weirdoguy
Sdog said:
Given that absolute zero is the lowest temperature possible, were all particles have zero vibration.
This is a very naive view of temperature. First, even at absolute zero, there can be residual zero-point energy (e.g., a molecule vibrates even at T = 0). Second, what about negative temperatures, which are actually hotter than an infinite temperature?
 
  • Like
Likes ScientistAlexandrus
russ_watters said:
Temperature is related to kinetic energy. The speed of light does not provide a limit to kinetic energy; kinetic energy increases without limit as you approach it.
If temmperature is the average of all particles kinetic energy in a substance and in this theoretical scenario all particles are moving at the speed of light then it does have an effect
 
  • Like
Likes ScientistAlexandrus
  • #10
Sdog said:
If temmperature is the average of all particles kinetic energy in a substance and in this theoretical scenario all particles are moving at the speed of light then it does have an effect
What effect is that? Did you understand what I wrote? I should add that particles can't move at the speed of light. Do you understand why and how that relates to what I said?
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
Planck units are not the biggest or smallest of anything. The Planck resistance is 30 ohms.
See above.
Planck's temperature has a specific unit of 1.417×10^32 kelvin
 
  • #12
Flatland said:
Planck's temperature has a specific unit of 1.417×10^32 kelvin

So what?
 
  • #13
weirdoguy said:
So what?

I can say the same about your previous comment.
 
  • #14
It was my first comment. Besides, you said that Planck temperature is the highest possible, which is not true. Then you gave its value, which does not change the fact that it's not the highest temperature, so I wonder what's your point.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Back
Top