Why is this correct - particle lifetime probability distribution

ponadto
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

The following problem can be found in van Kampen's "Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry", Third Edition (Exercise I.3.7):



The probability distribution of lifetimes in a population is P(t). Show that the conditional probability for individuals of age τ is
\begin{equation}
P(t|τ) = \frac{P(t)}{\int_τ^{\infty} P(t') dt'} \qquad (t>τ)
\end{equation}
Note that in the case $$P(t)=\gamma e^{-\gamma t}$$ one has $$P(t|\tau)=P(t-\tau),$$ the survival chance is independent of age. Show that this is the only P for which that is true.



Now, I am only interested in the first part of the problem - the expression for P(t|τ). A solution is given here:
http://www.claudiug.com/9780444529657/chapter.php?c=1&e=38
and I find it correct.

What I do not understand is: P(t|τ) is a conditional probability density. As such it should be expressed as a fraction of two probability densities. However, the denominator in the problem above is NOT a probability density, but actual probability (that the particle has age >τ).

Where is the catch?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ponadto said:
/B] P(t|τ) is a conditional probability density. As such it should be expressed as a fraction of two probability densities.

no, why?
After all, you condition on a real probability, namely that t>τ, not on a density.
 
Exactly, right?
But the definition says otherwise.

My point is: from the definition of probability density,
$$P_X(x) dx$$
is the probability that a random variable X has a value in [x,x+dx]. P(x) by itself is NOT the probability that the value of the random variable X will by precisely x. That is clear.

But the conditional probability density P_{X|Y}(x|y) has the following interpretation:
$$ P_{X|Y}(x|y) dx $$ is the probability that X will have a value from the set [x,x+dx], given that Y==y. Precisely equal, and not that Y will be in [y,y+dy].

And the Bayes' rule for conditional probability density is:
$$
P_{X|Y}(x|y) = \frac{P_{X,Y}(x,y)}{P_Y(y)}
$$
where all P-s, in particular P_Y, are probability densities.
(If the denominator vanishes, the conditional probability is not defined - conditions cannot be met.)
P_Y(y) is not the probability that Y==y.

And yet (going back to my original problem) I have P(τ) in the denominator, which is not a probability density, but a crude probability.

Why isn't there a probability density, that the lifetime of the particle is τ?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Back
Top