B Why is this interaction forbidden?

Soffie
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
So I'v been told that this interaction :

e- + e+ = mu- + e+

isn't allowed. Why not? I thought maybe because the mass of the muon is so much bigger, so would violate energy conservation, but the electron/positron could be moving relativistically and thus have enough energy.
Apparently the reason is because they're from different generations, but I have no idea what that means.

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neglecting neutrino mixing, the lepton numbers are conserved individually for electrons, muons and taus. On the right you have a muon and no antimuon or neutrino, on the left you have nothing like that. Similarly, on the right you have a position without partner while on the left side there is only an electron/positron pair.
 
  • Like
Likes Soffie
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top