Why is U-235 fissionable by thermal neutrons but U-238 not

  • Thread starter Thread starter saleem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrons Thermal
saleem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have this question

Why U-235 is fissionable by thermal neutrons whereas U-238
requires E>1.4MeV
Thank you:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
235 is fissle as it's activation energy/fissile barrier, the energy required to cause irreversible deformation of the nucleus is very low.

If you look at the semi empirical mass formula the coulomb and surface area terms reduce and increase respectivly (like a harmonic oscillator) when a neutron is absorbed by the nucleus. If the energy is great enough the coulomb term dominates and causes an irreversible deformation which leads to break up of the nucleus.

the activation energy is the energy required to do this

Im studying this currently myself so apologies if I am saying what you already know
 
Last edited:
neu said:
235 is fissle as it's activation energy/fissile barrier, the energy required to cause irreversible deformation of the nucleus is very low.

If you look at the semi empirical mass formula the coulomb and surface area terms reduce and increase respectivly (like a harmonic oscillator) when a neutron is absorbed by the nucleus. If the energy is great enough the coulomb term dominates and causes an irreversible deformation which leads to break up of the nucleus.

the activation energy is the energy required to do this

Im studying this currently myself so apologies if I am saying what you already know

if he knewed he wouldn´t asked ;)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top