Why is unitarity important in relativistic scattering processes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    S-matrix
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Why scattering matrix in relativistic collision still must be unitary?Because in relativistic regime,the probability is not conservable.
Thank you very much in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndung200790 said:
Please teach me this:
Why scattering matrix in relativistic collision still must be unitary?Because in relativistic regime,the probability is not conservable.
Thank you very much in advanced.

Probability must be conserved in each observer frame. This forces the requirement of unitarity.

If probability conservation were violated, there would be a positive probability that none of the outcomes happen. What could that mean? The in-particles would be lost. But this would just mean that the final state is the vacuum. But the vacuum is stable in time and because the dynamics is invertible, a final vacuum state implies a vacuum state at all earlier times. Thus in-particles cannot get lost - they must materialize as something.
Thus probabilities must sum to 1.
 
So,how is the probability conservable if we consider the process: 2 bodies--->n bodies scattering process.In this QTF theory process the probability is still conservable?
 
Unitarity is satisfied among quantum states.

In QFT, a quantum state is not associated with an individual particle, but with the whole system (vacuum + particles).

For example, unitarity ensures that
1 = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (\textmd{The probability of the initial two bodies getting scattered to be n bodies}).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
63
Views
7K
Replies
134
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
87
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Back
Top