Why is z = rcos(θ) and not z = rsin(θ) in surface integrals?
- Thread starter Miike012
- Start date
Click For Summary
Homework Help Overview
The discussion revolves around the use of polar coordinates in surface integrals, specifically addressing why the relationship z = rcos(θ) is preferred over z = rsin(θ). Participants are exploring the geometric interpretations and symmetry involved in these equations.
Discussion Character
- Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking
Approaches and Questions Raised
- Participants are questioning the symmetry between the variables x and z and whether it affects the choice of cosine or sine in the equations. Some express confusion over differing results when using sine instead of cosine.
Discussion Status
The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on the symmetry of the setup and its implications. There is acknowledgment of differing answers based on the choice of trigonometric functions, but no consensus has been reached on the preferred approach.
Contextual Notes
Some participants mention having different outcomes when using sine, indicating potential misunderstandings or assumptions that may need clarification. The symmetry of the setup is a recurring theme in the discussion.
Similar threads
- · Replies 7 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 2 ·