Why isn't the imaginary component j included in the complex vector equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the absence of the imaginary component "j" in the complex vector equation \hat{v}(t) = cos(\omega t)\hat{x} + sin(\omega t)\hat{y}. Participants question whether the equation can be reformulated to include "j" for a more accurate representation of complex vectors. It is suggested that the notation could imply mixing real and complex components, as the relationship between complex numbers and 2D vectors is isomorphic. One participant proposes that if x = 1 and y = j, then v(t) could be expressed as a complex number, potentially represented by the exponential function e^{it}. The conversation concludes with a recommendation to seek clarification from a teacher regarding the notation.
jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Problem/Statement
The complex vector, \hat{v}(t) = cos(\omega t)\hat{x} + sin(\omega t)\hat{y} is the unit vector \hat{v}(t) expressed in instantaneous form.

Question
What I am wondering is, why is there no imaginary component "j" in say the sin component for the equation above?

Can we express a general notation for complex vectors as,
\hat{v}(t) = [cos(\omega t) + sin(\omega t)]\hat{x}] + [cos(\omega t) + sin(\omega t)]\hat{y}]? Shouldn't that be the notation for the instantaneous form also?Thanks,Jeff
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Weird. You'd have to consult the source of the question (either your book or your professor or whatnot).

With the hats over the x and y, it almost looks like they are mixing R^2 and C. The two are, in fact, isomorphic, and anything you can say about complex numbers translates simply to a statement about vectors in a 2D plane.

If it were me, I'd make the assumption that they meant x = 1 and y = j. That way, v(t) is a complex number. (In fact, v would be the exponential function, e^{it}).
 
Tac-Tics said:
Weird. You'd have to consult the source of the question (either your book or your professor or whatnot).

With the hats over the x and y, it almost looks like they are mixing R^2 and C. The two are, in fact, isomorphic, and anything you can say about complex numbers translates simply to a statement about vectors in a 2D plane.

If it were me, I'd make the assumption that they meant x = 1 and y = j. That way, v(t) is a complex number. (In fact, v would be the exponential function, e^{it}).

Yea, I'm not sure. I think I will ask the teacher tomorrow. Oh I think I meant the following (as well),

Can we express a general notation for complex vectors as,
\hat{v}(t) = [[cos(\omega t) + sin(\omega t)]\hat{x} + j[cos(\omega t) + sin(\omega t)]\hat{y}]? Shouldn't that be the notation for the instantaneous form also?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top