Why isn't this circuit behaving like a low pass filter?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 4K views
chebyshevF
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to design a low pass filter from a transfer function (with one pole and one zero), and according to my textbook, the circuit which represents such a transfer function is of the following kind:
2howlkm.jpg

DC gain is 16.
Yet I get complete attenuation for low frequencies? Could my component values be wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Looks like you swapped the V+ and V- supply pins on the opamp.
 
The DC gain should be 1/16 ie R2 / R1.

Below 50 KHz it does function as a low pass filter. Did you plot down to 10 Hz?

The gain rises sharply above 100 KHz.
 
I got this frequency response with the LT1001 opamp. Would you mind posting the transfer function from your book? Thanks.

-24.1 dB = 20 log10(1/16)

eajl6.png
 
I'm not sure what simulation program you're using, but if it's like PSPICE, you need to use VAC as the input source to sweep frequency from low to high.
 
vk6kro said:
The DC gain should be 1/16 ie R2 / R1.

Below 50 KHz it does function as a low pass filter. Did you plot down to 10 Hz?

The gain rises sharply above 100 KHz.
Yep you're right about the DC gain being 1/16, that was my mistake typing it there. And I plotted from 20Hz.

gnurf said:
I got this frequency response with the LT1001 opamp. Would you mind posting the transfer function from your book? Thanks.

-24.1 dB = 20 log10(1/16)

http://imgur.com/eajl6.png
Actually this is my issue. I get the same Magnitude Bode Plot, yet what I don't understand is: why is my input amplitude being attenuated so much? I've set the amplitude at 20Vp, and according to the oscilliscope I include in the circuit, the output is in the mV range?! Isn't it supposed to be that with Low Pass Filter circuits, low frequency input signals are easily passed through as opposed to high frequency signals?

I was expecting the plot to start off at around just -0.3~ dB, but then again doesn't this depend on my DC gain? So I'm guessing I'd need a lower DC gain then?

As for the transfer function and corressponding circuit (taken from Intro to Electric Circuits, 7e, Dorf and Svoboda):
icl6id.jpg


Where I set R2=1000 Ohms. (And then calculate for the other components).
 
Last edited:
If you plot this below 10 Hz you will get a classic low pass filter. The gain below 10 Hz is about 1/16.

Above 1000 Hz roughly, the output is much lower than 1/16 vin. This is what you would expect.

The huge peak above 100 KHz is due to C3. If you remove this, you don't get this peak.

It helps to plot the vertical scale as linear rather than logarithmic.

[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4222062/LP%20filter2.PNG

This is with an input signal of 1 volt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
chebyshevF said:
I'm trying to design a low pass filter from a transfer function (with one pole and one zero), and according to my textbook, the circuit which represents such a transfer function is of the following kind:
2howlkm.jpg

DC gain is 16.
Yet I get complete attenuation for low frequencies? Could my component values be wrong?

well your battery connections are incorrect for a start the cct will not work in the current configuration ... you have + voltage from each battery going to the 2 supply terminals of the Op-amp. Reverse the battery connections on Pin 4 of the opamp so that - of that battery goes to pin 4 and the + of that battery to the GND rail (Negative rail of the other battery)

Dave
 
Isn't that just a matter of sloppy drawing. (Let him that is without sin cast the first stone).He still has the 15V and -15V labels to show his supplies are right. Anyway, if they weren't, the sircuit wouldn't do anything.