1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why magnetic field from a current carrying conductor obey inverse-square law?

  1. Nov 14, 2012 #1
    I have read that the electric field from a point charge fall off as 1/(r*r) since it is analogous to
    variation of intensity of radation from source (whose geometric proof depends on solid-angle), similarily is there any geometric explanation why magnetic field in the stated case fall off as 1/(r*r).
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 14, 2012 #2
    Bizarre "proof" that the static electric field is analoguous to a radiation... What about the gluon force? It increases over distance. What tells the previous reason in this case?

    As for the static magnetic field... It cannot decrease as 1/R^2 because this would need a permanent current in an open wire. Either it's static, and then you need to close the circuit, and this loop creates a field as 1/R^3, or you have an antenna which accepts only AC current, and radiates an electromagnetic field, not a static magnetic one.

    So 1/R^2 exists only as a computation intermediate of static magnetic fields.
  4. Nov 14, 2012 #3
    It doesn't, does it?
    The magnetic field of an infinite, linear conductor goes like 1/r where r is the distance from the wire (along the radius of a cylinder coaxial with the wire).
    Maybe you mean a different geometry of the current carrying conductor?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook