Why massless particles must travel at c

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding why massless particles must travel at the speed of light, c. The original poster seeks a logical argument to support this concept, particularly focusing on a particle with zero rest mass but nonzero energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore relationships between momentum, energy, and velocity without directly involving mass. Some question the implications of zero mass on energy and reference frames, while others attempt to derive equations that relate these concepts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing various perspectives and equations. Some have offered insights into the mathematical relationships involved, while others express uncertainty about the adequacy of their approaches. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple interpretations and lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of relativistic physics, including the implications of massless particles and the definitions of energy and momentum in different reference frames. There is mention of specific equations and terms that may require further clarification for some participants.

wtronic
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



give a logical argument for why a particle with m0 = 0 with nonzero energy has to move with a speed equal to c.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted using the momentum equation but I always get a multiplication by 0 which doesn't make sense to me... please some help

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can relate p, E, and v without explicitly involving m. Do you know how?
 
A particle with zero mass has to travel with c because his mass is independent of the reference frame (it´s zero in every reference frame) hence it has no rest energy in any reference frame ( you can´t transfer to one frame where it has energy and another where there is no energy because there is no rest energy).
But for the notion of particle to make any sense at all, having any manifestation in the real world, it has to contain some sort of energy and while this energy has to be the same in any reference frame it has to move with c.
how about that ?
 
2tesla, maybe since p = mv and E = mc^2 then I can write E = (c^2*p)/v...? but this equation doesn't justify why it has to go like speed c... because any v along with any p will give a value for energy..

am I wrong?
 
you seem to make sense, but I am guessing my professor is looking for something more mathematical... I don't know, if anything I will try with that
 
i guess the mathematical idea behind this is that [tex]p_{\mu}p^{\mu}=-M^2=0[/tex] hence if the mass is 0 the momentum and velocity are on the light cone which is one definition for speed c.
 
Last edited:
hi Brown, I am wondering where did you get that equation... and what mu means... thanks]
 
Just in case Mr.Brown's indices are unfamiliar to you, the equation he's referencing is:

[tex]E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2[/tex]

So, if you combine this with m=0 and the v=c^2*p/E you discovered just now, you should find your answer.

P.S. It doesn't make a difference here, but for future reference, in relativity:

[tex]p = \gamma mv[/tex]

and

[tex]E = \gamma mc^2[/tex]

where

[tex]\gamma = (1 - (v/c)^2)^{-1/2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K