Why Must the Wavelength Be Smaller Than the Interplanar Spacing in Bragg's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bragg Law
Roula
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone
I would like to ask you something related to the investigation of materials depending on Bragg Diffraction (Bragg Law).

It is a prerequisite, that the wavelength of the used radiation must be smaller than the dimension of the sample, by the meaning λ ≤ d , where λ is the wavelength and d is the interplaner spacing .

I know from Bragg law nλ=2dsinθ, that wavelength must be smaller than d in order to apply this law. But i can not understand physically the reason of that.
What is the physical reason that λ ≤ d ?

I am thankful for you all.

Roula
 
Physics news on Phys.org
simply, waves do not scatter unless the wavelength of incident wave is on the order or smaller than the feature you want to investigate.

if that were the case, you would not be able to listen to the radio in your house because the radio waves would be scattered by your wall thickness...
 
Dear Dr. Transport.
i am thankful for your response.

You are right that the wavelength must be smaller than the dimension to get scattered. And that was my question.

Could you please prove it for me ?
does the proof relate to Huygens–Fresnel principle ?

thanks again.
Roula
 
No answer :(
 
The wavelength don't has to be smaller than d for Bragg's law to be valid. It's just so that for λ<d the equation has the only solution n=0 and θ=0, i.e. the only possible solution is an unscattered wave.
 
Check Newton's book, scattering theory of particles and waves.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top