Stargazing Why Not Leave Hubble in Space Until It Fails?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the fate of the Hubble Space Telescope and the implications of leaving it in orbit until it fails. Participants express concern over the potential abandonment of the James Webb Space Telescope due to budget cuts, highlighting a perceived decline in the US space program. There are arguments for allowing Hubble to remain in space, as it poses no risk to human life, but concerns are raised about the dangers of uncontrolled re-entry and space debris. Planned re-entries are preferred to mitigate risks, as they allow for better management of where debris falls. Overall, the conversation reflects a mix of nostalgia for past achievements and anxiety about the future of space exploration.
Majo18
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, not sure if this is the correct forum but it seems physics will ultimately bring down the telescope. Why can't we leave the Hubble in space until it doesn't work anymore? It doesn't have any space crew to kill, it would break up on re-entree harming no-one and would continue to inspire our curiosity in the beauty of Space.

I Just finished reading an article saying that the Hubbles replacement, the James Webb Space telescope, may be abandoned after US budget cuts, a real stab at the heart! In conjunction with the ending of the Shuttle program I am feeling quite saddened, sensing the short-medium term (hopefully not) end of our exploration.

Or we may be heading to infinitely populating our finite world. Shame!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Big satellites don't burn up completely, so large pieces of debris can hit the earth. Chunks of satellites have hit houses. When Skylab reentered the atmosphere, the odds of a human somewhere in the world being hit were estimated to be only 1/150, and this was a planned reentry performed while the station was still maneuverable. (The Shire of Esperance in Australia fined the US $400 for littering.) Having a big bird drop at random gives you no control over where the debris will land.

I share your sadness over the collapse of the US space program.
 
Majo18 said:
Hey, not sure if this is the correct forum but it seems physics will ultimately bring down the telescope. Why can't we leave the Hubble in space until it doesn't work anymore? It doesn't have any space crew to kill, it would break up on re-entree harming no-one and would continue to inspire our curiosity in the beauty of Space.

A planned re-entry into the atmosphere is preferrred, so that the 'parts' fall into the ocean. Ships and other ocean faring craft can be notified in advance to be out of the designated area. When the craft breaks up in the atmosphere, there would most likely be chunks that you would not want falling on your head, nor for that matter your house.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top