Why position times mass is equal to 0 here (vanishes)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the term $$\sum_i m_ir_i$$ vanishes when the center of mass (CM) is considered. It is established that if the origin is taken as the center of mass, the sum is zero by definition. The position of the CM relative to an arbitrary origin is defined, and the relationship between the positions of mass elements relative to the CM and the origin is clarified. The key conclusion is that for the equation to hold true, the average position of the mass elements relative to the CM must equal zero. This understanding is crucial in the context of deriving angular momentum for rigid bodies.
Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
Why position times mass is 0 inside Sigma summation?
Relevant Equations
F=ma
$$\sum_i m_ir_i$$

Why the term always vanishes?
Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
There's some more equations where the mr was vanished. But, they didn't explain why it vanish. Why the term vanish? I think that's for position 0,isn't it?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
    Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 109
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the origin is taken as the centre of mass, then the sum is zero by definition.
 
PeroK said:
If the origin is taken as the centre of mass, then the sum is zero by definition.
I think the origin is at an arbitrary position. Vector ##\vec R## is the position of the CM of a rigid body relative to the origin. This looks like part of the proof that the angular momentum of a rigid body is the sum of the angular momentum of the CM (orbital) and about the CM (spin). The primed coordinate ##\vec {r_i}'## is the location of element ##dm_i## relative to the CM, i.e. ##\vec {r_i}'=\vec r-\vec R##. Otherwise yes, the sums are zero by definition of the CM.
Istiakshovon said:
There's some more equations where the mr was vanished. But, they didn't explain why it vanish. Why the term vanish?
Define ##\vec R## as the position of the CM relative to an arbitrary origin and ##\vec r## and ##\vec {r_i}'## respectively as the position of ##m_i## relaitve to the origin and relative to the CM. Then ##\vec r_i = \vec R+\vec {r_i}'## so you can write the position of the CM relative to the origin, $$\vec X=\frac{\sum_i m_i\vec r_i}{\sum_i m_i}=\frac{\sum_{i} m_i(\vec R+\vec {r_i}')}{\sum{_i} m_i}=\vec R+\frac{\sum{_i} m_i\vec {r_i}'}{\sum{_i} m_i}.$$ By definition, ##\vec X = \vec R##. The only way for this to be true is to have ##\dfrac{\sum_i m_i\vec {r_i}'}{\sum_i m_i}=0.##
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top