Why position times mass is equal to 0 here (vanishes)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the term $$\sum_i m_ir_i$$ vanishes when the center of mass (CM) is considered. It is established that if the origin is taken as the center of mass, the sum is zero by definition. The position of the CM relative to an arbitrary origin is defined, and the relationship between the positions of mass elements relative to the CM and the origin is clarified. The key conclusion is that for the equation to hold true, the average position of the mass elements relative to the CM must equal zero. This understanding is crucial in the context of deriving angular momentum for rigid bodies.
Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
Why position times mass is 0 inside Sigma summation?
Relevant Equations
F=ma
$$\sum_i m_ir_i$$

Why the term always vanishes?
Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
There's some more equations where the mr was vanished. But, they didn't explain why it vanish. Why the term vanish? I think that's for position 0,isn't it?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
    Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 110
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the origin is taken as the centre of mass, then the sum is zero by definition.
 
PeroK said:
If the origin is taken as the centre of mass, then the sum is zero by definition.
I think the origin is at an arbitrary position. Vector ##\vec R## is the position of the CM of a rigid body relative to the origin. This looks like part of the proof that the angular momentum of a rigid body is the sum of the angular momentum of the CM (orbital) and about the CM (spin). The primed coordinate ##\vec {r_i}'## is the location of element ##dm_i## relative to the CM, i.e. ##\vec {r_i}'=\vec r-\vec R##. Otherwise yes, the sums are zero by definition of the CM.
Istiakshovon said:
There's some more equations where the mr was vanished. But, they didn't explain why it vanish. Why the term vanish?
Define ##\vec R## as the position of the CM relative to an arbitrary origin and ##\vec r## and ##\vec {r_i}'## respectively as the position of ##m_i## relaitve to the origin and relative to the CM. Then ##\vec r_i = \vec R+\vec {r_i}'## so you can write the position of the CM relative to the origin, $$\vec X=\frac{\sum_i m_i\vec r_i}{\sum_i m_i}=\frac{\sum_{i} m_i(\vec R+\vec {r_i}')}{\sum{_i} m_i}=\vec R+\frac{\sum{_i} m_i\vec {r_i}'}{\sum{_i} m_i}.$$ By definition, ##\vec X = \vec R##. The only way for this to be true is to have ##\dfrac{\sum_i m_i\vec {r_i}'}{\sum_i m_i}=0.##
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top