Why position times mass is equal to 0 here (vanishes)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The term $$\sum_i m_ir_i$$ vanishes when the origin is defined as the center of mass (CM) of a rigid body. This is due to the definition of the CM, where the sum of the positions of mass elements relative to the CM equals zero. The position vector $$\vec R$$ represents the CM relative to an arbitrary origin, while $$\vec {r_i}'$$ denotes the position of each mass element $$dm_i$$ relative to the CM. The relationship $$\vec X = \frac{\sum_i m_i\vec r_i}{\sum_i m_i}$$ confirms that the CM is the point where the weighted average of the positions results in zero when calculated from the CM's perspective.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of center of mass (CM) concepts
  • Familiarity with vector notation and operations
  • Basic knowledge of rigid body dynamics
  • Proficiency in summation notation and its applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the center of mass in multi-body systems
  • Learn about angular momentum and its components in rigid body motion
  • Explore the implications of coordinate transformations in physics
  • Investigate the role of mass distribution in determining the center of mass
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying dynamics and kinematics of rigid bodies will benefit from this discussion.

Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
Why position times mass is 0 inside Sigma summation?
Relevant Equations
F=ma
$$\sum_i m_ir_i$$

Why the term always vanishes?
Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
There's some more equations where the mr was vanished. But, they didn't explain why it vanish. Why the term vanish? I think that's for position 0,isn't it?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
    Screenshot from 2021-08-23 00-39-56.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 123
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the origin is taken as the centre of mass, then the sum is zero by definition.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Istiak
PeroK said:
If the origin is taken as the centre of mass, then the sum is zero by definition.
I think the origin is at an arbitrary position. Vector ##\vec R## is the position of the CM of a rigid body relative to the origin. This looks like part of the proof that the angular momentum of a rigid body is the sum of the angular momentum of the CM (orbital) and about the CM (spin). The primed coordinate ##\vec {r_i}'## is the location of element ##dm_i## relative to the CM, i.e. ##\vec {r_i}'=\vec r-\vec R##. Otherwise yes, the sums are zero by definition of the CM.
Istiakshovon said:
There's some more equations where the mr was vanished. But, they didn't explain why it vanish. Why the term vanish?
Define ##\vec R## as the position of the CM relative to an arbitrary origin and ##\vec r## and ##\vec {r_i}'## respectively as the position of ##m_i## relaitve to the origin and relative to the CM. Then ##\vec r_i = \vec R+\vec {r_i}'## so you can write the position of the CM relative to the origin, $$\vec X=\frac{\sum_i m_i\vec r_i}{\sum_i m_i}=\frac{\sum_{i} m_i(\vec R+\vec {r_i}')}{\sum{_i} m_i}=\vec R+\frac{\sum{_i} m_i\vec {r_i}'}{\sum{_i} m_i}.$$ By definition, ##\vec X = \vec R##. The only way for this to be true is to have ##\dfrac{\sum_i m_i\vec {r_i}'}{\sum_i m_i}=0.##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
834
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K