Why pressure inside a liquid in different shaped vessels at

  • Thread starter Thread starter future Einstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Pressure in a liquid at a given depth is determined solely by the weight of the liquid above it, not by the shape or volume of the container. This means that in different shaped vessels, as long as the height of the liquid column is the same, the pressure at that depth will also be the same. The presence of walls or the shape of the vessel does not affect the pressure because it is a function of depth and density. Therefore, regardless of the container's design, the pressure at the same height remains consistent. Understanding this principle clarifies why pressure behaves uniformly in liquids across various vessel shapes.
future Einstein
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
why pressure inside a liquid in different shaped vessels at same height same thought they are of different volumes and shapes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really don't understand this question.
Could you rephrase it?
 
He's asking why pressure increases with depth in the same manner regardless of the shape of the container.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes future Einstein
rcgldr said:
He's asking why pressure increases with depth in the same manner regardless of the space of the container.
Yes.. Thats right..answer me please
 
future Einstein said:
why pressure inside a liquid in different shaped vessels at same height same thought they are of different volumes and shapes?
Why should it be different?
 
Why should it matter if there is a wall next to the water or just more water?

Or:

If pressure is equal to the weight of the water above (divided by area), why would it matter what is next to it?
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top