Why should I use conservation of energy?

AI Thread Summary
Using conservation of energy simplifies the analysis of the system involving two masses and a pulley, as demonstrated in the discussion. The initial approach using free body diagrams led to incorrect calculations, primarily due to errors in substituting values. The correct method involves recognizing that the total mass affecting acceleration includes both masses and half the pulley's mass. A suggestion was made to delay plugging in numerical values until the final stages of the calculations to avoid mistakes. Ultimately, using conservation of energy can yield the correct time of 2.06 seconds for the falling mass.
zewei1988
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the system shown in the figure with m1 = 23.00 kg, m2 = 13.60 kg, R = 0.13 m, and the mass of the uniform pulley M = 5.00 kg. Object m2 is resting on the floor, and object m1 is 5.00 m above the floor when it is released from rest. The pulley axis is frictionless. The cord is light, does not stretch, and does not slip on the pulley.


Homework Equations


KEi + Ugi = KEf + KEf(rotational) + Ugf


The Attempt at a Solution


Initially I keep trying to solve the problem by using free body diagrams and finding the acceleration. But all my answers were wrong.
However, I saw someone posted this question on yahoo answers and the solution he got was by using conservation of energy.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090423164312AAs5DN8"

I do not see the difference in using the conservation of energy method and my method. Can someone enlighten me? This topic is killing me. haha
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should get the same answer either way. Post your calculations so we can see where your attempt went wrong.
 
vela said:
You should get the same answer either way. Post your calculations so we can see where your attempt went wrong.

Ok, here are my workings:


Eqn 1:
23(9.8) - T1 = 23a
T1 = 225.4 - 23a

Eqn2:
T2 = 13.6a + 133

Eqn3:
0.13T1 - 0.13T2 = (0.5 * 5 * 0.132) * (a / 0.13)
T1 - T2 = 2.5a

Sub Eqn2 and Eqn1 into Eqn3:
92.4 = 158.5a
a = 0.583 m/s2

5 = 0.5 * 0.583 * t2
t = 4.14s


The correct answer is 2.06s (about half the time I calculated).
 
zewei1988 said:
Ok, here are my workings:


Eqn 1:
23(9.8) - T1 = 23a
T1 = 225.4 - 23a

Eqn2:
T2 = 13.6a + 133

Eqn3:
0.13T1 - 0.13T2 = (0.5 * 5 * 0.132) * (a / 0.13)
T1 - T2 = 2.5a
Good up to here, but something went wrong when you plugged the numbers in.
Sub Eqn2 and Eqn1 into Eqn3:
92.4 = 158.5a
The coefficient of a should be the sum of the two masses and half the pulley's mass, 13.60+23.00+0.5(5.00)=39.10 kg, not 158.5 kg.

One suggestion I have is to not plug any numbers in until the end. You probably could have avoided the error in this particular case.
a = 0.583 m/s2

5 = 0.5 * 0.583 * t2
t = 4.14s


The correct answer is 2.06s (about half the time I calculated).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top