Why Sine is an odd function and Cosine is an even function?

AI Thread Summary
Sine is classified as an odd function because it satisfies the property sin(-x) = -sin(x), while cosine is an even function since cos(-x) = cos(x). This distinction is illustrated through the unit circle, where rotating an angle in the negative direction results in sine values that are the opposite in sign but equal in magnitude, while cosine values remain unchanged. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these functions through their graphical representations and definitions on the unit circle. Specific examples, such as sin(-30) = -1/2 and cos(-60) = 1/2, support these properties, although questions arise regarding values in different quadrants. Overall, the unit circle and Taylor Series are recommended tools for grasping these concepts more clearly.
hmm?
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm curious if anyone can shed some light on my seemingly opaque brain as to why Sine is an odd function and Cosine is an even function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try graphing it, that should help. Sin(x) is odd because sin(-x)=-sin(x), whereas cos(x) is even because cos(-x)=cos(x). When looking at the definitions of sin and cos on the unit circle it should be obvious... if you go backwards x radians instead of forwards, you end up on the opposite side of the x-axis, but the same side of the y-axis. This is because you start at x=0 on the x-axis
 
Looking at the Taylor Series should help.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Try graphing it, that should help. Sin(x) is odd because sin(-x)=-sin(x), whereas cos(x) is even because cos(-x)=cos(x). When looking at the definitions of sin and cos on the unit circle it should be obvious... if you go backwards x radians instead of forwards, you end up on the opposite side of the x-axis, but the same side of the y-axis. This is because you start at x=0 on the x-axis

From what I gather, I think your explanation and the books is similiar. So as far as I can understand Cos(-60)=1/2 and Sin(-30)=-1/2 which satisfies the Sin(-x)=-Sinx and Cos(-x)=Cosx--this is not hard for me to comprehend, but I was thinking, what about Cos(-120)? Does this not equal -1/2, or Sin(-210)=1/2--does it vary with in certain quadrants? Anyways, thanks Officer shredder for pointing me in the right direction.
 
Look at the "unit circle" definition for the functions. As Office_Shredder said, the parity of the functions should be pretty obvious.

In case you don't know what I'm talking about:

Consider the point (1,0). If you rotate that point around the origin by an angle \theta counterclockwise, without changing its length, then you get a new point (x,y) (with x^2+y^2=1, which is why this is referred to as the "unit circle" defition - you're just rotating around a circle of radius 1 centered at the origin). We define \sin{\theta} = y and \cos{\theta} = x.

So if we rotate 0 degrees, you get \sin{\theta} = 0 since that just leaves you with (x,y)=(1,0). If you rotate around counterclockwise (ie. \theta is positive) with an angle \leq \pi, you see that y \geq 0, so \sin{\theta} = y \geq 0. If you then rotate by -\theta (ie. clockwise by the same angle) then you find that y is now of opposite sign but the same magnitude, ie. \sin{\theta} = -\sin{(-\theta)}. You'll see this works for angles \theta > \pi too if you think about it.

Seeing that \cos is even is equally easy with that definition.

(note I'm using radians for angles here which you may or may not be familiar with - in the above, \pi = 180^\circ)
 
Last edited:
Data said:
You'll see this works for angles \theta > \pi too if you think about it.

If you could provide me a demonstration of let's say \sin(-\frac{7\pi}{6}) = -\sin(\frac{7\pi}{6}) I would be most greatful, Data. As you can see, this is what excites the most trouble in my understanding--when \theta \geq 180. My apologies if I come off tenacious, but not understanding this completely vexes me inside!

Ahh! It should \frac{7\pi}{6} radians.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top