Why Sine is an odd function and Cosine is an even function?

hmm?
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm curious if anyone can shed some light on my seemingly opaque brain as to why Sine is an odd function and Cosine is an even function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try graphing it, that should help. Sin(x) is odd because sin(-x)=-sin(x), whereas cos(x) is even because cos(-x)=cos(x). When looking at the definitions of sin and cos on the unit circle it should be obvious... if you go backwards x radians instead of forwards, you end up on the opposite side of the x-axis, but the same side of the y-axis. This is because you start at x=0 on the x-axis
 
Looking at the Taylor Series should help.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Try graphing it, that should help. Sin(x) is odd because sin(-x)=-sin(x), whereas cos(x) is even because cos(-x)=cos(x). When looking at the definitions of sin and cos on the unit circle it should be obvious... if you go backwards x radians instead of forwards, you end up on the opposite side of the x-axis, but the same side of the y-axis. This is because you start at x=0 on the x-axis

From what I gather, I think your explanation and the books is similiar. So as far as I can understand Cos(-60)=1/2 and Sin(-30)=-1/2 which satisfies the Sin(-x)=-Sinx and Cos(-x)=Cosx--this is not hard for me to comprehend, but I was thinking, what about Cos(-120)? Does this not equal -1/2, or Sin(-210)=1/2--does it vary with in certain quadrants? Anyways, thanks Officer shredder for pointing me in the right direction.
 
Look at the "unit circle" definition for the functions. As Office_Shredder said, the parity of the functions should be pretty obvious.

In case you don't know what I'm talking about:

Consider the point (1,0). If you rotate that point around the origin by an angle \theta counterclockwise, without changing its length, then you get a new point (x,y) (with x^2+y^2=1, which is why this is referred to as the "unit circle" defition - you're just rotating around a circle of radius 1 centered at the origin). We define \sin{\theta} = y and \cos{\theta} = x.

So if we rotate 0 degrees, you get \sin{\theta} = 0 since that just leaves you with (x,y)=(1,0). If you rotate around counterclockwise (ie. \theta is positive) with an angle \leq \pi, you see that y \geq 0, so \sin{\theta} = y \geq 0. If you then rotate by -\theta (ie. clockwise by the same angle) then you find that y is now of opposite sign but the same magnitude, ie. \sin{\theta} = -\sin{(-\theta)}. You'll see this works for angles \theta > \pi too if you think about it.

Seeing that \cos is even is equally easy with that definition.

(note I'm using radians for angles here which you may or may not be familiar with - in the above, \pi = 180^\circ)
 
Last edited:
Data said:
You'll see this works for angles \theta > \pi too if you think about it.

If you could provide me a demonstration of let's say \sin(-\frac{7\pi}{6}) = -\sin(\frac{7\pi}{6}) I would be most greatful, Data. As you can see, this is what excites the most trouble in my understanding--when \theta \geq 180. My apologies if I come off tenacious, but not understanding this completely vexes me inside!

Ahh! It should \frac{7\pi}{6} radians.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top