Why some bodies are magnetized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abrowaqas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies
AI Thread Summary
Magnetism in materials varies significantly, with ferromagnetic materials like iron, cobalt, and nickel exhibiting strong magnetism due to unbalanced electron orbitals that maintain alignment outside a magnetic field. Paramagnetic materials, such as most metals, only show magnetism when exposed to a magnetic field, while diamagnetic materials like wood and glass are weakly repelled and cannot be magnetized due to their non-crystalline structure. Antiferromagnetic materials, such as copper, exhibit no net magnetism because their magnetic electrons align in opposite directions. Ferrimagnetic materials, like certain iron oxides, have partial cancellation of magnetic moments, resulting in weaker magnetism. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the principles of magnetism and its applications.
abrowaqas
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Why only the magnetic bodies can be strongly magnetized while other bodies like wood, copper, glass e.t.c are hardly affected?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Almost?) All materials are more or less diamagnetic. Diamagnetism originates in changes in the electron orbit, but this effect is quite weak.

Only some materials are ferromagnetic.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=395265
This effect is different and rather due to rearrangements of the electron spin direction. Ferromagnetism is usually much stronger.

Then there are also paramagnetic materials. There the spins align themselve slightly, but tend to randomize.

Maybe it's best for you to read up about these three type of magnetism :) I might have mixed up some details, but the general idea is OK :)
 
****ing magnets, how do they work?

WELL, most metals are paramagnetic, meaning that their magnetic electrons only align and are magnetic when they are in a magnetic field, and are random when they are not.

Fe, Co and Ni are FERROMAGNETIC, meaning their magnetic electrons keep their alignment when they are out of a magnetic field. Why? They have unbalanced 3d orbitals.

Cu is ANTIFERROMAGNETIC, meaning that they have no magnetic charge even in a magnetic field. Why? The magnetic electrons alternate in opposite directions, so they have no net magnetism

There is also FERRIMAGNETIC materials, such as Fe(x)O(y). This is because there are different types of Iron Oxides (e.g. FeO and Fe2O3) which only partially cancel out the net magnetic moment. So, they have a weaker magnetism.

I'm working from memory here, so research it properly yourself, but I think this won't lead you to far astray.

To understand hard and soft magnetism, look into magnetic domains. well worth it.

EDIT:
oh, wood isn't crystalline, so can't align and can't be magnetic (DIAMAGNETIC)
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top