Why some particles have no mass even similar sized ones?

Neon
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
Photon have the same size as an electron(i think) but no mass. Gluons also. WHY
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I meant gluons have no mass not same size
 
Neon said:
Photon have the same size as an electron(i think) but no mass.

Photons are not the same size as electrons. Technically, assigning a size to either particle is very problematic. Both are considered to be point-particles, which means they are considered to be of 'zero size', but in reality quantum effects tend to smear out the position of either particle based on their wavelength/mass.

Neon said:
WHY

That would require a very complicated mathematical description of Quantum Electrodynamics and the Higgs Field. The simple answer is that electrons simply have mass, and photons don't.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top