Why the Neutrino oscillates and the electron doesn't?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_pulp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Neutrino
the_pulp
Messages
206
Reaction score
9
I mean, the electron neutrino can transform in a muon neutrino after a while. And that surprised the physics community because the electron can't transform to a muon. But

1) can't the electron transform into a W and a W into a muon?
2) So, Why we say that the neutrino oscillate and the electron doesn´t?
3) Why we make all that mess of mixing angle? can't we say that the electron neutrino transforms into a W and then it transform into a muon neutrino?

Sorry for my ignorance and thanks in advance for sharing your knowledge!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you mean a process like e- → W- + ve → W- + vμ → μ-, this is prohibited for a free particle by energy/momentum conservation even if the total energy of the incoming electron is sufficient to create a muon. This is similar to why a free electon cannot radiate photons.
 
AdrianTheRock said:
Assuming you mean a process like e- → W- + ve → W- + vμ → μ-, this is prohibited for a free particle by energy/momentum conservation even if the total energy of the incoming electron is sufficient to create a muon. This is similar to why a free electon cannot radiate photons.
Well, with the same argument, you could rule out ve -> vμ.
The interesting point at mixing is the difference of flavor and mass eigenstates - if electrons and muons could mix, there is no "mass of an electron", as an electron would be a superposition of three different mass eigenstates.

An interesting question - but even if mixing is possible, I think it would be extremely rare.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top