Why the reflection and transmission?

tim_lou
Messages
682
Reaction score
1
in solving the time-dependent Schrödinger's equation for the delta potential, one obtain a set of non-normalizable solutions.

form the boundary condition and comparing the coefficients of the solution, one obtains the probability of transmission and reflection.

However, how can one be sure that such events occur in a mathematical standpoint? suppose one has a wave traveling from -infinity (a time-dependent localized wave packet that solves the time-dependent Schrodinger's equation), how does one prove that after a very long time (as time approaches infinity),

the integral:
\lim_{t\rightarrow +\infty}\int_{-\infty}^0\left|\Psi(x,t)\right|^2dx

is the reflection coefficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmmm, I think I see it now, the probability current can give me some hand waving argument to this...

But is there a more rigorous way (mathematically), perhaps something involving the general form of a wave packet?
 
For a physicist, the probability that a particle moving to the right has not passed go in an infinite time defines R. A mathemetician would need an existence proof using epsilon and delta.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top