Why they stack the vector that way

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
v1 is
(0)
(1)
(2)
(3)

v2 is
(2)
(a)
(1)
(0)

W1 is
(3)
(1)
(1)
(0)

W2 is
(-2)
(4)
(2)
(6)

i am asked to find the dim of v+w ??

i was told to flip each vector by 90 degrees
so
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)

in the matrix presented a a row (a b c d)
and then do a row reduction

but they just keep it as it they were originaly (as columns) and do a row reduction

0 2 3 -2
1 a 1 4
2 1 1 2
3 0 0 6


??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi transgalactic! :wink:

I'm not sure what your question is,

but if you're asking whether using a column reduction is just as valid as using a row reduction, the answer is yes. :smile:
 
no they present them as columns instead of flipping them
and then they do a row reduction

??
 
He answered your question: it doesn't matter whether you represent vectors as columns or rows!
 
ahhh ok
thanks :)
 
it does matter
because when i flipped it and did a row reduction i got
-2 4 2 6
0 10 8 6
0 0 -2-8a -6a+36
0 0 0 10a+40

but in the not flipped version i get
1 0 0 -2
0 1 0 4
0 0 1 2
0 0 0 -3a -3

??
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top