I Why things do not stop immediately?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter parshyaa
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When a retarding force is applied to a moving ball, it cannot stop immediately due to the requirement of infinite acceleration, which is not physically possible. The discussion highlights that to change velocity in zero time necessitates infinite force, making instantaneous stops impossible. Examples from sports, like a cricketer catching a ball, illustrate that allowing time for deceleration reduces force and potential injury. The conversation also touches on the value of mathematical reasoning versus simple statements of Newton's First Law. Ultimately, understanding the physics behind motion and force clarifies why immediate stops cannot occur.
parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
Why things do not stops immediately when a retarding force is applied on a moving ball.
  • I know this is a foolish question but I have tried to give the answer
  • my attempt : suppose I have applied force on a moving ball(its moving on a non frictional plane) and I want to stop it immediately means at a time = 0.
  • F = m.a(this is a retarding force applied on ball and 'a' is the constant deaccelaration due to force on a ball )
  • a = dv/dt , adt = dv , suppose initial velocity of a ball is 0.
  • ∫a dt = ∫dv , lower limit and uppar limit for velocity is 0 and v and for time 0 and t
  • Therefore v = at , to get immediate stop, t =0 , in that case a = ∞ , and F = ma , ∴F = ∞ , but it is impossible to apply infinite force. Therefore it is impossible to stop things immediately.
  • What's your answer or opinion
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning looks correct. Average acceleration is change in velocity divided by time. So to change velocity by a nonzero amount in zero time would require infinite negative acceleration, which would require infinite force.

If you watch slow-motion footage of a cricketer or baseballer catching a fast ball, you'll see they let their hand(s) move backwards a little way after making contact. That increases the deceleration time, thereby reducing the force, thereby reducing the likelihood of the ball bouncing out of their hands (as well as lessening the potential damage to their hands).
 
Thanks andrewkirk for fielders example.
 
Why bother with the math? You should be able to just state Newton's First Law of motion.
 
russ_watters said:
Why bother with the math? You should be able to just state Newton's First Law of motion.
Yes you are right but maths makes everything more clearer
 
parshyaa said:
Yes you are right but maths makes everything more clearer
If you say so...let me know if your teacher agrees.
 
russ_watters said:
If you say so...let me know if your teacher agrees.
Hee hee , what's wrong in this answer , this question was mine and I will not showiy to my teacher. ^_^ ^_^
 
parshyaa said:
  • a = dv/dt , adt = dv , suppose initial velocity of a ball is 0.
So you want to "stop" a ball with zero initial velocity?
You can do this instantaneously. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes bsheikho
nasgot itpost: 5565525 said:
So you want to "stop" a ball with zero initial velocity?
You can do this instantaneously. :smile:
Hey nasu u got it , I was thinking of editing , ball was moving with constant velocity v and limit should be from v to 0 . And equation will be at = -v , a = -(v/t) it is negative because retarding force was applied ,
 
Back
Top