Why Use Z-Scores for Motion Data Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jophysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale
jophysics
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would like to know something about the possibility to convert data set into z-scores to ensure a common scale for analysis. More specifically, when this conversion is needed and why. I am working on motion data (from 3 persons) tracked from video and I can use a common reference for the whole data set or a reference for each single person. I found the z-score conversion in a paper, but I cannot understand when it is really needed.

thank you


jo
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The basic assumption in using z-scores is that the attribute you're measuring is normally distributed. The z-score allows you to transform values that have a mean of mu and a standard deviation of sigma to new values with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. The reason for doing this is that there are widely published tables with probabilities for z-scores, while such tables for the raw x-scores can be found rarely, if at all.

Hope that helps.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top