Why +ve terminal of electrolytic caps must be connected to +ve of battery?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dexterdev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery
AI Thread Summary
Electrolytic capacitors must be connected with the positive terminal to the higher DC potential to maintain the integrity of the thin insulating layer of Aluminium Oxide, which serves as the dielectric. Reversing the polarity can destroy this layer, turning the capacitor into a conductor and potentially causing it to fail catastrophically. Such failures can result in the capacitor exploding and releasing its contents in a messy and hazardous manner. For applications involving AC, it is recommended to use two capacitors in a back-to-back configuration to ensure proper polarity is maintained. Proper usage and adherence to polarity are crucial to prevent damage and ensure safe operation.
dexterdev
Messages
194
Reaction score
1
Hi all,
I have a doubt regarding electrolytic capacitor. Why the electrolytic capacitor should be connected to higher DC potential in the circuit. What happens if the opposite happens? Also how electrolytic capacitors must be used where varying voltage comes across it?

-Devanand
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is a very thin insuating layer of Aluminium Oxide on one of the plates of the capacitor. This was formed by applying a voltage to the capacitor.

This layer is the dielectric of the capacitor, so it is very important.

So, it is important that you don't reverse the polarity as this can destroy this thin layer.

If you don't follow this polarity, the results get very messy.
I have never seen one of these explode, but I know they do because I have cleaned up the sticky mess that results. The capacitors vomit their entire contents as a steaming hot, foul smelling, sticky mess.

Just don't do it.

I have seen circuits where an electro is used for AC but I wouldn't do it. You can get non polarized capacitors and these should be used where high capacitance is needed.
 
dexterdev said:
Hi all,
I have a doubt regarding electrolytic capacitor. Why the electrolytic capacitor should be connected to higher DC potential in the circuit. What happens if the opposite happens? Also how electrolytic capacitors must be used where varying voltage comes across it?
The oxide insulator is formed in the factory by electrolysis in the finished product, the oxygen reacts with the surface of the thin aluminium foil. If you reverse the working voltage, this oxide layer can be removed and the capacitor becomes a conductor.

For AC usage, two capacitors are joined back to back, so this means one oxide layer is always being enhanced by the polarity.

I've seen small electrolytics connected with reverse polarity disintegrate with a bang exactly like a fire cracker, throwing shredded material as from a firecracker everywhere, including in the student's hair.
 
thankyou for replies.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top