Will a Magnet and Copper Tube Hourglass Be Accurate Due to Lenz's Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on creating an hourglass timepiece utilizing Lenz's Law with a magnet and copper tube. Accuracy concerns are raised, particularly regarding the influence of temperature on material resistance, which affects the fall time of the magnet. The idea is that a thicker-walled copper tube may provide the longest fall time for a small magnet, while the purity of the copper is also crucial for minimizing resistance. Participants suggest that using high-purity materials, like C110 copper plates, could enhance performance. The size of the magnet is also considered, with smaller magnets potentially affecting the overall timing.
ljfe
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I had the idea of making an hourglass timepiece employing lenz's law using a magnet and copper tube (or copper bars for visibility).

Any idea how accurate my hourglass will be? I know Lenz's law is effected by temperature (not sure by how much).

If I drop a small magnet drop through a small thick walled copper tube, would that would give me the longest fall time? I think i read somewhere that thinner magnets would fall slower
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lenz's law itself is not a function of temperature, but the net effect you describe is a function of the material's resistance which in turn is a function of temp. Recall that for zero resistance (super conductor e.g.) you would get no movement and the magnetic is levitated. The thing to calculate I believe for you is the energy dissipated as resistance heating relative to the potential energy of the object. You'll want to control the resistance in the copper, so very pure, phone-line grade copper? I guess.

Or if you can get your hands on some high purity $ilver...
 
Thanks for the reply. is 1/4in C110 plates good? I wonder how magnet size would effect it? I ordered really small magnets
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top