Will a Rolling Ball on a Level Surface Ever Stop?

AI Thread Summary
A ball rolling on a level surface will eventually stop due to friction, despite the textbook model suggesting no acceleration on a flat plane. The model assumes zero friction and energy loss, which does not reflect real-world conditions. In reality, rolling involves energy conversion to heat and drag as the ball interacts with the surface. Additionally, the contact area between the ball and the ground creates a restoring torque that contributes to slowing down the motion. Thus, the idealized model fails to account for these factors, leading to the conclusion that a rolling ball will not maintain its motion indefinitely.
Euclid
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
The textbook solution for a pipe rolling down an incline is a = \frac{1}{2} g \sin \theta. Putting in theta = 0 gives a = 0. Does this imply that a ball rolling along a level surface will never stop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that the object will not accelerate on a level plane if gravity is the only force.
 
Gravity is not the only force on an incline. Friction acts as well. And friction acts on a level plane too. So a rolling ball should come to a stop due to friction...
 
the textbook solution was for an "idealized model" with zero friction.
The MODEL has zero friction. Your fault if you try to apply this model
to situations where friction is NOT ignorable.

You're right, the model has a (hard) surface's Force as well as gravity's Force. And it suggests that the pipe rolling on a level floor will not slow down. Don't try this a home ; you'll soon over-reach this model when the pipe hits the kitchen table.
 
You said that this is the formula for a pipe rolling. If it was sliding, then friction would be a problem, but as it is rolling, friction shouldn't be the problem should it?
If I'm right, then the error would be due to some of the kinetic energy of motion being converted to heat, due to the particles of the pipe hitting against the particles in the surface when it is rolling, and drag.
So the textbook model was from an idealised model with friction, but with no energy loss as heat or drag.
 
There is also the fact that, it is not exactly one point that touches the ground during rolling motion as we assume in the ideal case. There will be an area which is in contact with the ground. Due to this the Normal force does not pass exactly through the center and hence there's a restoring torque which slows down the pipe.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top