Will a subwavelength conductor patch reflect specularly?

AI Thread Summary
A metal stripe longer than the wavelength but narrower than one wavelength will not reflect specularly; instead, it will re-radiate energy according to its radiation pattern. The excitation of the stripe depends on the direction of incoming energy and its polarization, which is crucial in determining the scattering behavior. If the stripe is narrower than one wavelength, it may form a linear array of dipoles that can create a "glint" effect, reinforcing waves in specific directions. To avoid glint, the stripe's width should be reduced to less than one-tenth of a wavelength, which is significant for radar stealth applications. Polarization of the incoming radiation also affects resonance, potentially altering the reflection characteristics.
Christofer Br
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
If I had metal stripe significantly longer than the wavelength but less wide than one wavelength and it would be at an angle in the plane perpendicular the length of the stripe to to the incoming wave, would itireflect specurarly or diffusely?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not specular. The incident energy would excite your metal stripe resonator, which would then re-radiate the incident energy according to the radiation pattern of the metal stripe scatterer. The magnitude of excitation would be the product of the direction of energy arrival and the scatterer radiation pattern, polarisation is important.

A large field of dipoles can “glint” because all the small spherical wavefronts can reinforce to make a plane wave where the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection.

If your scatterer is narrower than one wavelength, it could still be a half wavelength wide which would make a long linear array of resonant dipoles. That might glint in a particular direction. You need to reduce the width of the conductive stripe to below about one tenth of a wavelength to prevent glint. That is important for radar stealth design.
 
Baluncore said:
Not specular. The incident energy would excite your metal stripe resonator, which would then re-radiate the incident energy according to the radiation pattern of the metal stripe scatterer. The magnitude of excitation would be the product of the direction of energy arrival and the scatterer radiation pattern, polarisation is important.

A large field of dipoles can “glint” because all the small spherical wavefronts can reinforce to make a plane wave where the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection.

If your scatterer is narrower than one wavelength, it could still be a half wavelength wide which would make a long linear array of resonant dipoles. That might glint in a particular direction. You need to reduce the width of the conductive stripe to below about one tenth of a wavelength to prevent glint. That is important for radar stealth design.
What if the incoming radiation was polarized in the plane of the length of the stripe, there should be no resonance then, correct? Would such polarizsd radiation reflect specularly?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top