Will advanced technology lead to socialism?

AI Thread Summary
In a technologically advanced society, access to essential commodities should be widespread and affordable, reflecting true progress. Historical examples illustrate this shift, such as the evolution of cell phones from the expensive Motorola DynaTAC 8000X in 1983 to today's subsidized, low-cost options available to the homeless. This democratization of technology suggests that even the poorest can access advanced tools. Wealth accumulation among the affluent often leads to philanthropy, which some argue aligns with socialist principles, as wealthy individuals give back to society. There is speculation about a future where traditional currency may become obsolete, raising questions about the implications of technological innovation on economic structures. However, contrasting views highlight that despite technological advancements, many still face rising living costs, challenging the notion that innovation inherently leads to equitable access and social progress.
McCartney
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
In a truly technologically advanced society everything is available to all for little money. If such a thing does not happen then there is no technological progress.

In 1983 the Motorola DynaTAC 8000X cell phone was 4k and as heavy as a brick. The battery only lasted a 1/2 hr. Nowadays many homeless have much more advanced no frills cell phones which are subsidized. The price of these no frills phones is less than 10 USD.

In a few years a commodity only available to folks with means is now available to the most poor in society.

The true wealthy people often reach a point where accumulating more wealth becomes redundant. These folks become philanthropists and by definition socialists as they give money away. This is mostly facilitated by technological development.

We are not far away from a time where currency will be impractical.

The end result of technological innovation is socialism.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
No. My bills are getting larger, not smaller.
 
I totally agree. It doesn't mater if you can't afford food and housing as long you can have a really cheap cellphone.:rolleyes:
 
McCartney said:
In a truly technologically advanced society everything is available to all for little money. If such a thing does not happen then there is no technological progress.

In 1983 the Motorola DynaTAC 8000X cell phone was 4k and as heavy as a brick. The battery only lasted a 1/2 hr. Nowadays many homeless have much more advanced no frills cell phones which are subsidized. The price of these no frills phones is less than 10 USD.

In a few years a commodity only available to folks with means is now available to the most poor in society.

The true wealthy people often reach a point where accumulating more wealth becomes redundant. These folks become philanthropists and by definition socialists as they give money away. This is mostly facilitated by technological development.

We are not far away from a time where currency will be impractical.

The end result of technological innovation is socialism.
This is ridiculous, just look at past philanthropists, it had nothing to do with technology.
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top