Will anyone ever accept that the universe is a three dimensional net?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumNet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Net Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the universe as a three-dimensional net, suggesting that the passage of time is a result of this net's movement. It critiques the acceptance of higher dimensions, labeling such beliefs as foolishness. The conversation acknowledges various theories like spin, knot theory, and relativity but emphasizes a preference for a three-dimensional perspective. One participant expresses comfort with four-dimensional Minkowski space, arguing against the assumption that others share the same understanding. Overall, the debate highlights a divide between those who support a multi-dimensional universe and those who advocate for a simpler, three-dimensional model.
QuantumNet
Will anyone ever accept that the universe is a threedimensionall net?
That time passing is a consequence of net moving?

Therefor spinn, sink-source, knot, string, ether, relativity and all the other theories you ever came up with.

Foolishness is driving you into believing in more than three dimensions,
and deed deed inside, you know this.

http://www.quantumnet-string.tk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
Actually, inside I am quite comfortable with Minkowskian four dimensionality. Don't assume that because you feel or "know" something is true that others fell or know the same.
 

Thread 'Illuminating Black Hole Shadows with Dark Matter Annihilation'

Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
View full post »

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Similar threads

I Is the Three-Dimensional Universe Explained by Knot Theory?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Development of dimensional universe since big bang.
Replies
3
Views
3K
Relationship between expanding universe and time
Replies
26
Views
8K
Possible non-existence of black holes and its consequences
Replies
9
Views
3K
Big Bang, big rip, lQc, has anyone ever run a computer simulation?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Universe Expansion: is it really expanding?
Replies
10
Views
4K
Shape, structure, and nature of the universe - questions/theories
Replies
1
Views
3K
A "Monstrous Higgs and Leech Spacetime"
Replies
0
Views
3K
Two separate barycenters of a binary system in a small closed universe?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Seeing the edge of an unbounded, closed universe
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top