Will Gravity Affect the Speed of Rockets Traveling Parallel to Each Other?

sirsmokealot
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi, i got a question

Lets say we got 2 rockets X km appart, traveling parallel to each other in a straight line at the same constant speed. Now let's put a massive object like the Sun on one of sides on the plane the two spaceships make. Which one will get to the finish line first? Would the gravity of the Sun make one of the rockets get there first because gravity "distorts" time or will they pass the finish line simultaneously?

Sorry for my explanation, hard to explain myself in english when its not my native language. But this picture should clarify.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 428
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF...

You weren't very clear, but the way you worded the problem implies to me a very simple answer:
...traveling parallel to each other in a straight line at the same constant speed...
You didn't specify reference frames from which you would measure those, but if the speed is the same and the distance is the same, then the time is the same.

I suspect, though, that you were trying to ask something more complicated...
 
Ok, let me try to explain a little more. Let's say you were in the rocket farthest away from the sun, then your time would go faster then the other rockets time. You would use less time, thus finishing earlier. But you are both traveling the same length with the same speed so arent you getting there simultaneously?
 
sirsmokealot said:
Lets say we got 2 rockets X km appart, traveling parallel to each other in a straight line at the same constant speed.
So they basically inertially moving projectiles, with no thrust?
sirsmokealot said:
Would the gravity of the Sun make one of the rockets get there first because gravity "distorts" time or will they pass the finish line simultaneously?
Hard to say for the setup in your picture, but let's make the situation simpler by having both rockets keep their straight flight path, and traveling initially at v << c:
Rocket A is far away from the mass, not affected by gravity.
Rocket B travels straight trough the center of the mass (imagine it has a tunnel), which is placed in the middle between start and finish.

In that case rocket B would be faster, due to greater average velocity. Even if its end velocity is the same as A's again, due to symmetry of acceleration & deceleration. This the same for Newtonian Gravity.

But if you replace the rockets with light signals, it's the opposite outcome in General Relativity. Signal B cannot be accelerated beyond c, but will be "slowed down" globally by space curvature. In fact it will simply have more space to cross between start and finish.

Maybe someone else knows at which speed between v << c and v = c they would arrive together. That would be the velocity at which the acceleration is exactly canceled out by the gravitational time dilation due to curved time and longer distance due to curved space.
 
Last edited:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top