Will multi-core processors reach their limit with Intel's new Ivy Bridge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FishmanGeertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the alleged die shot of the upcoming 8-16 core Intel "Ivy Bridge" processor, which is reportedly a shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture from 32nm to 22nm. While some sources validate the image's legitimacy, there is uncertainty about its authenticity. Ivy Bridge is not considered a new micro-architecture, unlike future architectures like Haswell and Rockwell, which are expected to introduce significant changes. Concerns are raised about the industry's reliance on increasing core counts to enhance performance, reminiscent of the pre-dual core era when clock speeds were pushed to their limits. There is skepticism regarding the practical application of 16-core processors, as most current software, particularly PC games, may not effectively utilize such power. Instead, tasks like HD video encoding and CAD could benefit more from additional cores. The discussion also highlights the growing trend of offloading CPU tasks to GPUs, which possess superior computational capabilities.
FishmanGeertz
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
I think it's a little early for a die shot of the 8-16 core Intel "Ivy Bridge" processor, but this is an alleged photo.

IvyBridge.jpg


Is it real?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Whats the source of the image?
 
KrisOhn said:
Whats the source of the image?

http://mtmcv.com/intel-plans-new-factory-in-the-u-s-the-modernization-of-other-22nm-tech/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All the Ivy Bridge is, is a shrinking of the Sandy Bridge architecture. This seems legit, other sources are saying the same thing, so yeah, Ivy Bridge is happening.

Whether that is a legitimate picture of the new die, I couldn't tell you.
 
KrisOhn said:
All the Ivy Bridge is, is a shrinking of the Sandy Bridge architecture. This seems legit, other sources are saying the same thing, so yeah, Ivy Bridge is happening.

Whether that is a legitimate picture of the new die, I couldn't tell you.

I thought the Ivy Bridge was an entirely new micro-architecture.

What about Haswell and Rockwell?
 
Ivy Bridge is just a shrink of Sandy Bridge. From 32nm to 22nm.

Haswell and Rockwell should be entirely new architecture.
 
KrisOhn said:
Ivy Bridge is just a shrink of Sandy Bridge. From 32nm to 22nm.

Haswell and Rockwell should be entirely new architecture.

When will we see 16-core chips?
 
Hopefully never.

I feel the industry is coming up against another wall just like they did in the pre-dual core era, when they were just trying to get chips to run higher and higher clock speeds to get them faster, they were coming up against a limit of how far they could push the chips. Now they're just shoving more and more cores onto the chips to get them faster... we need another break like we had when the dual cores came out.

Edit: wooo, post 100.
 
KrisOhn said:
Hopefully never.

I feel the industry is coming up against another wall just like they did in the pre-dual core era, when they were just trying to get chips to run higher and higher clock speeds to get them faster, they were coming up against a limit of how far they could push the chips. Now they're just shoving more and more cores onto the chips to get them faster... we need another break like we had when the dual cores came out.

Edit: wooo, post 100.

I don't see how things like PC games could utilize the power of 16 cores/32 threads. The only thing which would really benefit from that much CPU horsepower are things like HD video encoding and CAD.

With Nvidia "CUDA" CPU tasks are being handed to the computationally superior GPU. The difference in speed is like day and night. Most high-end GPU's have teraflop (trillions of calculations per second) computing power. CPU's don't have TFLOP power, yet.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top