Will the Stone Catch Up with the Parachute Before Hitting the Ground?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cole07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parachute
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a parachute and a stone dropped from a cliff. The parachute descends at a constant speed of 1.2 m/s, taking approximately 48.33 seconds to reach the ground. The stone, dropped 43 seconds later, is calculated to hit the ground in about 3.44 seconds. Since this time is less than the parachute's descent time, the stone will catch up with the parachute before it reaches the ground. The solution confirms that the answer to whether the stone catches the parachute is yes.
Cole07
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
problem:
A. A small parachute dropped from a 58-m-high cliff falls with a constant velocity of 1.2m/s. 43s after the parachute is dropped, a stone is dropped from the cliff. will the stone catch up with the parachute before it reaches the ground? yes or no?

B. how long would it take for the parachute to reach the ground if it didn't get hit by the stone?

C. How long would it take the stone to hit the ground if there were no interference from the parachute?

Solutions I have tried:


A. For this I need to know B & C and I know that c needs to be less than 5 seconds


B. For this I take the equation 1.2m/s = 58/t and i solve for t my answer is 48.3333


C. For this I know initial velocity is 0 I'm not sure about the final velocity acceleration is -9.8 and t is my unknown but I don't understand how to find it since I do not have my final velocity.

Would this Work final velocity= square root of initial velocity squared+2a*d and the answer would be 33.71646482 then i would use final velocity= initial velocity+ a*t the answer would be 3.440455594s so since this is less than 5s the answer to A would be yes ? Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cole07 said:
B. For this I take the equation 1.2m/s = 58/t and i solve for t my answer is 48.3333
Good.
C. For this I know initial velocity is 0 I'm not sure about the final velocity acceleration is -9.8 and t is my unknown but I don't understand how to find it since I do not have my final velocity.
You don't need to be given the final velocity--you have the distance.

Would this Work final velocity= square root of initial velocity squared+2a*d and the answer would be 33.71646482 then i would use final velocity= initial velocity+ a*t the answer would be 3.440455594s so since this is less than 5s the answer to A would be yes ? Is this correct?
Absolutely correct!

But you could also do it with less work by using a different kinematic equation--one that relates distance, time, and acceleration.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top