Winding Copper wire / strip on Aluminium body

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and efficiency of a heater project utilizing a copper strip or wire wound around an aluminum body to improve heat transfer for melting corrosive liquids, specifically in the context of using a 12V battery and a Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) material. Participants explore the implications of using copper in conjunction with aluminum, particularly regarding thermal conductivity and potential corrosion issues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using copper strips or wire to enhance heat transfer from the heating element to the aluminum body, questioning whether this would effectively increase heating under the given constraints.
  • Another participant raises concerns about corrosion between copper and aluminum, particularly in a seawater environment, and questions the effectiveness of copper in this application.
  • A different participant emphasizes the importance of separating copper and aluminum to prevent corrosion, suggesting that corrosion could create a thermal barrier affecting heat transfer.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of the heating rate being determined by the power of the heating element and the characteristics of the liquid being heated, rather than solely by the materials used.
  • One participant questions the relevance of the arrangement of metals in affecting the seawater temperature, suggesting that heat loss to the surroundings is a critical factor in determining the final temperature of the seawater.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the diagrams provided, indicating confusion about the current path and the arrangement of the heating elements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness and implications of using copper with aluminum in the heater design, particularly regarding corrosion and thermal performance. There is no consensus on the best approach or the potential effectiveness of the proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for careful consideration of the thermal resistance at the copper-aluminum interface and the impact of seawater on corrosion. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the heat loss dynamics in the system, which may not be fully addressed by the proposed material changes.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineers and designers working on heating systems, particularly in corrosive environments, as well as those exploring material interactions in thermal applications.

Navaneetha
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

Greetings. I am new to this forum. I am working for a heater project, in which we use plastic (PA66) over molded on aluminum (6061-T6) body for melting corrosive liquids (similar to sea water). The Aluminum body is heated by means of Positive temperature coefficient material (PTC) from a 12V battery. The problem we face is, the quantity of heat is not sufficient to melt the stated quantity of liquid in a specified time. We have constrains like not to change the size of the outer surface of heater and supplied voltage. But room to play inside the heater. Hence i am looking to use copper strip placed inside slots provided in Aluminum body or to wind copper wire wound around Aluminum body and then over molding by plastic. In these solutions, i have bottle neck like whether these copper strip will really contribute for extra heating of Aluminum body for the given voltage ? The copper material having thermal conductivity (400 W/m-K) will contribute for effective heat transfer but the resistivity is less (1.72e-8 Ohm-m). Will this solution work ? Also, do we need an insulating material between copper strip and wire in between Aluminum body ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You need to separate the Copper and Aluminium really well or you will get serious corrosion problems under those circs. I am not sure what the copper is supposed to achieve?
But why not use simple resistance wire as your heating element?
 
Hello Mr.Sophiecentaur,

Thank you for your reply. Do you mean direct contact between copper and aluminum cuases corrosion in a normal environment ? In our case, Copper wire wound around Aluminum body will be plastic overmolded by Nylon which is resistant towards corrosion. The Copper (400W/m-K) with high thermal conductivity than aluminum (250W/m-K) will have better transfer heat rate from Copper to Aluminum. Also, inorder to save cost and weight of the system, we are inneed to go for 1:3 ratio for Copper:Aluminum.
 
Seawater will cause copper / aluminium interfaces to corrode very quickly so you need to separate them well. This could have an effect on the total thermal resistance. (Certainly, a layer or corrosion could provide a high thermal barrier.)

But what limits the heating rate is basically going to be the Power of the Heating Element, the volume of liquid to be heated and the rate it is circulating. Conduction within the heater, whether it is simple or composite construction will only affect the core temperature - which may not be very important.

To get a good answer about this, you need to know something about the temperature gradients across the various interfaces (particularly across the plastic sheathing, I should imagine). I think the difference in conductivity for those two metals may not be very relevant to the overall thermal performance.
 
Mr. Sophiecentaur,

I have attached the cross section of the new and existing heater which i mean. The heat transfer follows: Copper -> Aluminum -> Nylon -> Seawater. The maximum power input that can be provided is 100W from 12V battery. Currently the heat output from PTC in existing heater is not sufficient to heat specified amount of liquid, hence i am looking for the new heater solution. Do you think will this be a bad solution and let me know the concerns involved in this ?
 

Attachments

  • Heater Comparsion.jpg
    Heater Comparsion.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 580
It isn't clear what is what in those two diagrams. Is one of those horizontal bars the resistive element? What is the current path?

But I don't think this is relevant, compared with the Power flow situation. Why should you think that the sea water temperature would be particularly affected by the particular arrangement of the metals?
I think you need to go back to square one in your thinking and consider the following basics:
The seawater will be losing heat to surroundings and, in a steady state, will reach a temperature at which the heat supplied equals the heat lost, per unit time. What is the mass of seawater? Is the container insulated? Is there a steady flow of water?
If you are stuck with 100W of available power then, as I said before, the final temperature of the seawater will be governed by the rate of heat LOSS from the water and not the thermal conductivity of the heater element; the core temperature will just end up at a different value. (You could, for instance, use a 100W filament bulb, with a filament temperature of 3000C or a thick heating element with an internal temperature of 200C and the sea water would end up at the same temperature)
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
305
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
22K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K